Malaysia-China Relations Since MH370

{
  "authors": [
    "Vikram Nehru"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Southeast Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

Malaysia-China Relations Since MH370

The disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has not had a long-lasting impact on Malaysia-China relations.

By Vikram Nehru

Published on Mar 2, 2015

Source: VOA Global

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared on March 8, 2014, and two thirds of its 239 passengers were Chinese. Vikram Nehru, senior associate in Southeast Asia Studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, spoke to VOA Global about how the MH370 tragedy has impacted Malaysia-China relations in the past year.

This interview was originally broadcast on VOA Global.

About the Author

Vikram Nehru

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Nehru was a nonresident senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program. An expert on development economics, growth, poverty reduction, debt sustainability, governance, and the performance and prospects of East Asia, his research focuses on the economic, political, and strategic issues confronting Asia, particularly Southeast Asia.

Recent Work

In The Media
Southeast Asia, the Redback, and Reality
- Vikram Nehru
In The Media
Now Comes Aung San Suu Kyi’s True Test of Leadership
- Vikram Nehru

Foreign Policy East Asia China Southeast Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Paper
Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft Power
Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.
Sarah Yerkes
Research
Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech Policy
A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.
+5
Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …
Commentary
Diwan
How the Israel Lobby Distorts U.S. Foreign Policy and Domestic Liberties
In an interview, Ian Lustick and Eli Clifton discuss their new book on why a prominent ally has so much influence in America.
Michael Young
Paper
AI Breakout Capacity: A Middle-Power Path Between Racing and Dependence
Germany, India, and other middle powers can’t build frontier AI alone, and they risk being cut off if they depend on the United States or China. The way through is to build the capacity for a frontier sprint while hoping never to use it.
Anton Leicht, Sam Winter-Levy
Commentary
China Financial Markets
The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for China
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Tourists taking photos in front of the White House on a sunny day

Paper

Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft Power

Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.

Sarah Yerkes

Research

Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech Policy

A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.

- +5
Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …

Commentary

Diwan

How the Israel Lobby Distorts U.S. Foreign Policy and Domestic Liberties

In an interview, Ian Lustick and Eli Clifton discuss their new book on why a prominent ally has so much influence in America.

Michael Young

Two men sit on red chairs in front of a window with a NYC city skyline.

Paper

AI Breakout Capacity: A Middle-Power Path Between Racing and Dependence

Germany, India, and other middle powers can’t build frontier AI alone, and they risk being cut off if they depend on the United States or China. The way through is to build the capacity for a frontier sprint while hoping never to use it.

Anton Leicht, Sam Winter-Levy

Commentary

China Financial Markets

The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for China

The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.

Michael Pettis