Commentary
It’s dangerous to dismiss Washington’s shambolic diplomacy out of hand.
Eric Ciaramella
{
"authors": [
"Frederic Wehrey"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Libya",
"Maghreb"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Military"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Use of Cluster Bombs in Libya Calls into Question Lifting of UN Arms Embargo
Frederic Wehrey discusses evidence of the use of cluster munitions as well as the ongoing civil war in Libya.
Published on Mar 16, 2015
Source: RFI
During his recent trip to Libya, Frederic Wehrey saw evidence of cluster munitions used against a bank in Libya. The munitions were probably used by the aircraft of the Dignity camp, who obtained the munitions from the former Qaddafi regime in Libya. Preventing the use of the munitions in the future may not be easy as there is an ongoing civil war in Libya with “winner take all” mentality dominating the thinking of the fighting factions.
While both the Dawn and Dignity camps have access to heavy artillery, tanks, and grad rockets the real difference between the weapons of the two sides is that Dignity has more aircraft and has access to munitions for these aircraft from outside of Libya. While Dawn has repaired some aircraft, this side has been flying far less sorties.
But the aircraft on Dignity side, including the ones that have probably used cluster munitions, may not be all that effective. Those aircraft fly and bomb at high altitudes, making them very inaccurate. Also, historical evidence suggests that aircraft alone are not decisive in victory. As the “balance of weakness” continues in Libya, it will be hard to end the ongoing conflict in Libya. This has made the conflict particularly bloody.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- What If Trump Gets His Russia-Ukraine Deal?
- To Survive, the EU Must SplitCommentary
Leaning into a multispeed Europe that includes the UK is the way Europeans don’t get relegated to suffering what they must, while the mighty United States and China do what they want.
Rym Momtaz
- Russia’s Unspoken Condition for Ending the War Is Zelensky’s ResignationCommentary
Insisting on Zelensky’s resignation is not just a personal vendetta, but a clear signal that the Kremlin would like to send to all its neighbors: even if you manage to put up some resistance, you will ultimately pay the price—including on a personal level.
Vladislav Gorin
- For Putin, Increasing Russia’s Nuclear Threat Matters More Than the Triad’s ModernizationCommentary
For Putin, upgrading Russia’s nuclear forces was a secondary goal. The main aim was to gain an advantage over the West, including by strengthening the nuclear threat on all fronts. That made growth in missile arsenals and a new arms race inevitable.
Maxim Starchak
- Japan’s “Militarist Turn” and What It Means for RussiaCommentary
For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.
James D.J. Brown
