• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Security"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Chinese Takeaway: Parrikar Missing

The tone of disinterest in Asian defense diplomacy, set by former Indian Defense Minister A.K. Antony during the UPA years, appears to continue under the Narendra Modi government.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on May 26, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

As top defence leaders from across the Indo-Pacific meet this week at the annual Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore, the Indian defence minister will once again be conspicuous by his absence. Rising China’s growing assertiveness and the uncertainties surrounding the American pivot to Asia have triggered an intensive interest in the region to expand defence engagement with New Delhi.

But the ministry of defence (MoD) seems as reluctant as ever to raise its regional security profile. Governments might come and go, but some things obviously don’t change at the MoD. The tone of disinterest in Asian defence diplomacy, set by A.K. Antony during the UPA years, appears to continue under the Narendra Modi government.

South Block’s reluctance to participate effectively in the Shangri La Dialogue stands in contrast to the growing importance of the forum. The deterioration of China’s relations with the US and Japan and the mounting military tensions between China and its Southeast Asian neighbours, especially Vietnam and the Philippines, have resulted in an intensification of regional defence diplomacy. With few formal mechanisms for addressing security challenges in Asia, the Shangri La Dialogue has become a valuable forum for the exchange of ideas and informal interaction between senior defence policymakers.

During his eight long years at the MoD, Antony chose to speak at the Shangri La conference just once. Nor was there much certainty about who represents India. One year, it is the MoS for defence; it is the NSA or the chief of naval staff in others. In any case, the MoD does not decide until the very last minute on who might speak.

Acting East?

Last year, amid the regime change in Delhi, no one from the MoD showed up at the Shangri La Dialogue. For whatever reason, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has chosen to skip the forum. One wonders if the tall talk of “acting east” by PM Modi and External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj travels to the other end of South Block.

Expanding defence partnerships has become a dominant theme of foreign policy articulation by Modi and Swaraj. This has seen the renewal of the 10-year defence framework with the US, expanding the security partnerships in Asia with Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Vietnam, Fiji and Australia. Modi and Swaraj have been more willing than the UPA to speak up on issues that animate Asia, especially the South China Sea, where Beijing, Hanoi and Manila are scrambling to secure their competing claims through land reclamation and expansion of military facilities. Last week, the Chinese navy challenged a US surveillance aircraft near the disputed Spratly Islands. A war of words between Beijing and Washington has ensued.

Modi has been forthright in affirming India’s strategic stakes in the South China Sea. He has underlined the importance of China respecting the freedom of navigation in the disputed waters. The NDA government has also set a valuable example to Beijing by settling India’s maritime territorial disputes with Bangladesh peacefully, in accordance with the principles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas.

Defence Diplomacy

Growing expectations in the region that the Modi government is ready to play a leadership role in securing a stable balance of power in Asia have also been reinforced by India’s impressive evacuation of civilians from Yemen and its quick response to the Nepal earthquake. If India has a great story to offer Asia on security issues, Parrikar will not be there to tell it in Singapore.

In normal circumstances, the Shangri La Dialogue would be a standard date on the defence minister’s annual calendar. He would be travelling there with senior officials for an intensive round of exchanges with key Asian states. But there is a big problem: the MoD has neither a policy commitment nor the institutional capability for defence diplomacy. If Modi does not change this, the shadow between Delhi’s diplomatic talk and defence action will continue to grow darker.

This article was originally published by the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicySecurityAsiaSouth AsiaIndiaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Parliamentary Elections in Occupied Ukraine Risk Backfiring for the Kremlin

    Despite unhappiness on the ground, Moscow is determined to use both carrot and stick to ensure there is record support for United Russia in occupied Ukraine.

      Konstantin Skorkin

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Nolan’s "The Odyssey" Has a Colonialism Problem

    Despite Morocco’s hopes that its film industry would reap rewards, the blockbuster’s success will be tainted by controversy surrounding filming in occupied Western Sahara.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes

  • Paper
    Securing America’s Near Abroad: Recalibrating U.S. Policy Toward Haiti

    Helping to stabilize Haiti is in the United States’ national interest and can be done by making wise use of various foreign policy tools in addition to supporting international security forces.

      Christopher Shell

  • Aerial view of Washington DC
    Paper
    Network and Structural Power: The Four Trend Lines Weakening U.S. Leverage

    Networks—from international payments platforms to key economic sectors—underlie many aspects of U.S. power. But they are suffering under an extractive approach to foreign policy.

      Daniel W. Drezner

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Europe Cannot Negotiate a New Yalta with Russia

    While Russia is not ready to sue for peace on Europe’s terms, it could still either seek a ceasefire in Ukraine or try escalation. Brussels needs to prepare for both and prioritize that preparation over normative discussions.

      Kadri Liik

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.