Paper
Christopher S. Chivvis, Rohan Mukherjee, Milan Vaishnav
{
"authors": [
"Milan Vaishnav"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"South Asia",
"India"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Civil Society"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
New Rules for Indian Politics
There are three clear lessons that can be drawn from India’s 2014 election.
Published on Jun 29, 2015
Source: IDFC
Milan Vaishnav spoke about the 2014 Indian elections at the IDFC Institute in New Delhi. The talk brings together a few of Dr. Vaishnav's current research projects to address whether the recent election was truly a "game changer." He began by laying out the facts of the election, including that it was the largest election in human history and that it is the first time a party other than the Indian National Congress has won such a resounding mandate in India. He noted, optimistically, that while the election was polarized along religious lines, Narendra Modi won in large part due to his successful record as Chief Minister of Gujarat, suggesting that the Indian electorate is rewarding competent governance in a way it has not in the past. In other areas, though, such as the presence of political dynasties in the legislature and the electoral success of criminals, this election was an example of continuity rather than change.Vaishnav pointed to three key takeaways from this election. First, the BJP has supplanted the Congress as the dominant pole around which Indian politics revolves. Second, though identity politics are still important, they are not sufficient to win; politicians must combine identity-based appeals with strong records on economic and governance issues if they are to succeed. Third, though voters may be shifting their preferences and regional parties are proliferating, the nature of the candidates themselves has not changed much.
About the Author
Milan Vaishnav
Director and Senior Fellow, South Asia Program
Milan Vaishnav is a senior fellow and director of the South Asia Program and the host of the Grand Tamasha podcast at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His primary research focus is the political economy of India, and he examines issues such as corruption and governance, state capacity, federalism, and electoral behavior. He also conducts research on the Indian diaspora.
- How Populist Middle Powers Are—and Are Not—Reshaping Global Politics
- Carnegie’s Summer Beach ReadsCommentary
- +8
Sophia Besch, Eric Ciaramella, Steve Feldstein, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- How Europe’s 2027 Elections Could Test EU GovernanceArticle
Radical-right parties are expected to do well in upcoming elections in four of the EU's biggest member states. If successful, they could prevent the union from addressing key challenges ahead.
Stefan Lehne
- Ten Years After Karimov’s Death, How Much Has Uzbekistan Really Changed?Commentary
In the tenth year of his presidency, President Mirziyoyev’s system is becoming even more personalized than that of his predecessor Karimov.
Galiya Ibragimova
- How to Engage with New Media: A Strategic Guide for Nonprofit OrganizationsPaper
To remain effective, organizations need to master new media and legitimacy markers to make a once-in-a-century shift.
Renée DiResta, Rachel Kleinfeld, Margot Treadwell
- As It Turns 25, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Reflects the New World OrderCommentary
With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.
Temur Umarov
- Is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Performance Art or Meaningful Collaboration?Commentary
Xi, Putin, and other regional leaders are back-slapping in Bishkek, but the SCO has yet to answer the most serious questions about continental Asia's economic future.
Evan A. Feigenbaum
