Research
- +10
Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …
{
"authors": [
"Moisés Naím"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Why CEOs Today Will Have Shorter Tenures
From the Vatican to the military to the C-suite, power is not just dissipating—it’s decaying.
By Moisés Naím
Published on Nov 4, 2015
Source: Fortune
No matter if you look at the Vatican or the military or the C-suite, power is not just dissipating—it’s decaying.
That was the message from Moisés Naím, author of The End of Power, at the Fortune Global Forum on Wednesday, November 4, 2015.
It’s easier to gain power today, but it’s “harder to use and easier to lose,” said Naím, who is also a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington.Naím outlined the three fundamental forces that he believes have created this shift—what he calls the three revolutions.
The first is the “more revolution,” meaning there are more people than ever before, more technology, more guns, more terrorists. The “mobility revolution” means that everything—from physical goods and services to ideas—travels further and faster. And the “mentality revolution” has led to a profound change in aspirations, especially from the middle class. These three revolutions work in concert to undermine power, he said.
“I would never argue that the world doesn’t have still important concentrations of power,” he said, but those in control can do less with it. He gave the example of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who he would argue has less power today than five years ago because of economic turmoil caused by sanctions and a middle class of an unprecedented size and aspirations.
Naím also pointed to examples of shake ups within corporate America, citing a statistic noted earlier in the conference by Cisco Executive Chairman John Chambers that 40% of the companies on Fortune 500 won’t exist in a decade.
To deal with this new world order, Naím said companies today have to have a laser-like focus on what they’re good at without losing sight of what’s happening on the periphery. “The threat is not from natural, normal traditional markets but from places you don’t even imagine,” he said.
The good news, Naím, said is that the world is less secure for tyrants and monopolists, and that small companies have a “shot at challenging and eating the lunch of mega-players.”
The bad news for the group of CEOs and power players in the audience? “All of you have shortest tenures than your predecessors.”
About the Author
Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.
- The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
- View From Latin AmericaCommentary
Moisés Naím
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in UkraineCommentary
The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.
Rym Momtaz
- How the Kremlin Achieved Its Latest Implausible Election ResultsCommentary
Sergei Kiriyenko used Russia’s parliamentary vote to further hone his strategy of corporate mobilization that is designed to maximize votes for United Russia.
Andrey Pertsev
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis
- The Uncomfortable Truth About EU EnlargementCommentary
Before the next wave of EU enlargement takes place, the union needs to grapple with thorny questions of how power is distributed among its members.
Emil Sondaj Hansen, Ditte Brasso Sørensen
- Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?Commentary
The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.
Dimitar Bechev
