• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Raja-Mandala: India, U.S., and Artificial Intelligence

Engagement with the U.S. defense establishment is only an important first step towards Delhi’s strategic appreciation of the stakes in the development of artificial intelligence and associated technologies.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Apr 12, 2016
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

This week, in Geneva, Indian diplomats are closely monitoring an international expert review of the legal implications of the so-called “lethal autonomous weapons”. These weapons will have the capability of selecting and engaging targets on their own. Although fully autonomous weapons are yet to register significant presence in the arsenal of any nation, many consider their development and deployment inevitable in the coming years.

Rapid advances in robotics, machine-learning and big-data analytics are at once driving the so-called “fourth industrial revolution” and the transformation of modern warfare. How the leading powers mobilise and deploy these technologies will shape the balance of economic and military power among them in the coming decades.

At the centre of it all is the science and engineering of artificial intelligence (AI), or computer algorithms that can perform many functions, such as vision, voice recognition, decision-making and the capacity to process vast quantities of information, which are usually associated with humans.

While autonomous weapons are not going to take humans out of the loop any time soon, AI technologies can augment human ability to handle very complex military tasks more quickly. It’s this man-machine interface that’s likely to be the centre of the new military revolution that’s unfolding.

Given its sweeping impact on the civilian and military domains, the fast-paced AI developments should be of concern to not just a handful of Indian diplomats but also all its key economic and national security decision-makers. One way of sensitising the Indian system is to put AI on the agenda for the discussions with visiting US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, who has been the strongest champion in the Obama administration for deepening America’s strategic partnership with New Delhi.

Carter, who arrived in Goa over the weekend, is in Delhi today for formal discussions with the Indian leadership, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Carter has been driving the Pentagon to leverage AI to America’s strategic advantage over rivals like China and Russia as well as sophisticated terror groups like the Islamic State.

The new approach has been branded the “Third Offset Strategy”. Like the two earlier offsets — tactical nuclear weapons and precision-guided conventional munitions — the US hopes that AI and associated technologies will help America counter the quantitative superiority its rivals Russia and China enjoy in Eurasia and the Western Pacific.

For India too, AI might be critical in coping with the growing gap in conventional military capabilities that has opened up with China. The Chinese defence budget is now more than four times that of India and Beijing has devoted considerable intellectual and policy energies to transform the organisation and doctrine of its armed forces.

AI is also likely to play an important role in countering Pakistan’s low-intensity conflict against India through such proxies as the Lashkar-e-Taiba. India has indeed invested some resources in the military research on AI and robotics. But the changes in its security environment and the technological advances around the world demand a strong high-level political commitment to the development of AI.

This, in turn, would necessarily involve the development of long-term partnerships, especially with the US. In Geneva, both India and the US have not supported calls for an outright pre-emptive ban on the development and deployment of autonomous weapons. Both have called for a prudent approach to the regulation of autonomous weapons. Delhi and Washington are also committed to a stable Asian balance of power and in combating violent extremism. Both these objectives will involve the development and deployment of AI technologies.

But the greatest imperative for Indo-US cooperation comes from the expansive role of the private sector in the development of AI and associated technologies in both countries. Carter has returned the Pentagon to a more active collaboration with Silicon Valley in shaping the Third Offset Strategy. He has recently appointed Google’s Eric Schmidt as the chairman of a new Defence Innovation Advisory Board.

As it turns out, India’s own computer industry is deeply tied to Silicon valley and both sides can build on this connection to strengthen their development and utilisation of AI. Unlike in the earlier military revolutions, India has some capabilities and knowledge in the emerging AI sector.

Engagement with the US defense establishment can only be an important first step towards Delhi’s strategic appreciation of the stakes in the development of AI and associated technologies. In the end, success depends on India’s ability and will to create a domestic policy framework for the promotion of AI applications for civilian and military uses.

Effective use of these will help India accelerate its own economic growth, address its national security challenges and gain an effective voice in the international regulation of autonomous weapons and robotic warfare. Delhi was rather slow in waking up to the impact of the cyber revolution; it can’t afford to make the same error in relation to the AI transformation.

This article originally appeared in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicySecurityMilitaryTechnologyUnited StatesSouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Two men wave and point to the sky against a dark background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    "Digger" May Be the Most Influential Climate Movie Yet

    Despite its flop at the box office, the film raises important questions for the climate community to answer.

      Leonardo Martinez-Diaz

  • Commentary
    Turning Russian Assets into Financing for Ukraine Now

    Funding Ukraine remains a priority for European leaders. As Russia’s war of aggression heads into another winter, two feasible options to mobilize support for Kyiv should be fast-tracked.

      Vladyslav Rashkovan, Gregory P. Wilson

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Stalled at the Front, Russia Seeks to Undermine Ukraine’s Economic Capacity

    Russian strikes are weakening the economy sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Closing the growing funding gap will require more European support and politically contentious reforms in Kyiv.

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    An American Muslim Exception?

    In an interview, Rozina Ali discusses her new book on the rise and manifestations of Islamophobia in the United States.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU’s Middle-Power Puzzle

    While the EU and European governments are embracing the much-lauded middle-power moment, this entails three difficult conundrums.

      Richard Youngs

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.