Commentary
An Armenia-Azerbaijan settlement may be the only realistic test case for making glossy promises a reality.
Garo Paylan
{
"authors": [
"Matt Ferchen"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China and the Developing World",
"China’s Foreign Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Latin America and the Caribbean
The recent expansion of China’s Belt and Road Initiative into Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is unlikely to bring fundamental change to China–LAC economic relations. It may, however, catalyze a more volatile LAC–China–US geopolitical relationship.
By Matt Ferchen
Published on Dec 20, 2018
Source: International Institute of Strategic Studies
Until quite recently, Chinese officials claimed that Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) were beyond the central geographic scope of both the continental Eurasian “belt” and the Asian and African maritime “road.” From 2017, however, an increasing number of countries in South and Central America, as well as in the Caribbean, have signed BRI-related memoranda of understanding and announced related business deals, signaling that the BRI has now extended to the Americas. Nevertheless, despite the hype and anxiety surrounding the BRI’s apparent extension to the region, it remains unclear whether its rollout there will change entrenched patterns, challenges and dysfunctions in the China–LAC relationship or merely deepen them. Moreover, at a time of growing U.S.-China strategic rivalry, the expansion of BRI-themed dealmaking in LAC is already playing into growing great power competition and tension.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Trump Wants “Peace Through Construction.” There’s One Place It Could Actually Work.
- Can Venezuela Move From Economic Stabilization to a Democratic Transition?Commentary
Venezuelans deserve to participate in collective decisionmaking and determine their own futures.
Jennifer McCoy
- Win-Win: The Potential and Prospects of German FDI in Supporting the Structural Transformation of African EconomiesPaper
German manufacturing firms in Africa add value, jobs, and skills, while benefiting from demand and a diversification of trade and investment partners. It is in the interest of both African economies and Germany to deepen economic relations.
Hannah Grupp, Paul M. Lubeck
- The EU and India in TandemCommentary
As European leadership prepares for the sixteenth EU-India Summit, both sides must reckon with trade-offs in order to secure a mutually beneficial Free Trade Agreement.
Dinakar Peri
- Lack of Finance Is Not the Only Constraint on Global DevelopmentArticle
Global development needs imagination to update the purposes, structures, and systems of outmoded institutions to make them fit for today’s world.
David McNair
