Source: Getty
commentary
Carnegie Europe

The European Defense Fund: Key Issues and Controversies

The European Defense Fund holds the potential to fundamentally challenge the nature of the EU as a peace project.

by Raluca Csernatoni and Bruno Oliveira Martins
published by
Peace Research Institute Oslo
 on March 1, 2019

Source: Peace Research Institute Oslo

The recently-launched European Defence Fund (EDF) is a ground-breaking investment in the areas of security and defence and holds the potential to fundamentally challenge the nature of the European Union (EU) as a peace project.

Proponents of the EDF frame the initiative as crucial to European security in an age of increasing political instability and rapid technological change. As such, the EDF is framed as a much-needed catalyst for scaling up the EU’s defence by conferring strategic autonomy to Europe, and overhauling a lagging European Defence Technological and Industrial Base.

To achieve these goals, the EDF stresses the need to optimise strategic value for money by funding cutting-edge research and innovation and by fostering the development of interoperable defence capabilities. However, the EDF also raises important questions about EU’s political priorities, output legitimacy, and security and defence governance.

Read Full Text

This policy brief was originally published by the Peace Research Institute in Oslo (PRIO).

SecurityEuropeWestern EuropeIran
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More work from Carnegie

  • collection
    Transatlantic Relations

    The transatlantic relationship has been a cornerstone of the international system for over a century, but liberal democracies on both sides of the Atlantic have struggled to adequately adapt to a globalized and digitalized world and anti-liberal populist forces have threatened democratic institutions. As Europeans wonder about the United States’s political future and the U.S. failure to sufficiently address the climate emergency, and Americans worry that Europe remains politically and materially unprepared to shoulder its own security even as some in Europe fail to recognize the significance of internal and external authoritarian threats, this project examines key issues that will define the next chapter of transatlanticism.

    This project is led by Daniel Baer.

  • two suited men who are facing the camera and talking to sailors with their backs to the camera on a ship
    commentary
    Emissary
    NATO’s Northeast Countries Have a Template for Europe’s New Security Reality

    Ramping up the Joint Expeditionary Force would contribute to European security and prepare the continent for a second Trump administration.

  • commentary
    Hopes and Uncertainties in Syria

    After the fast disintegration of the Assad regime, the difficult reconstruction of the Syrian state is only just beginning. Meanwhile, Europe, Israel, Russia, Türkiye, and the United States have major stakes in Syria’s complex future.

  • commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe’s Wake-Up Call for Tech Leadership

    Europe’s digital future cannot hinge on Washington’s whims or the outcome of elections every four years. To achieve a level of technological autonomy, Europe needs targeted investments and responsible innovation in key sectors.

  • commentary
    Diwan
    Anatomy of a Military Fall

    Why did Bashar al-Assad’s armed forces fail to act, unlike those in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, and Sudan?