• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Frederic Wehrey"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "The Day After: Navigating a Post-Pandemic World"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia",
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Commentary

View From Libya

Putin has dispatched mercenaries to Libya’s civil war, exploiting the protracted conflict to carve out a new sphere of influence in North Africa.

Link Copied
By Frederic Wehrey
Published on Sep 9, 2020
Program mobile hero image

Program

Russia and Eurasia

The Russia and Eurasia Program continues Carnegie’s long tradition of independent research on major political, societal, and security trends in and U.S. policy toward a region that has been upended by Russia’s war against Ukraine.  Leaders regularly turn to our work for clear-eyed, relevant analyses on the region to inform their policy decisions.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

It was the mortar rounds that worried Muhammad the most. They fell with a frequency he’d never encountered. “Like rain,” he said.

Then there were the snipers. Their shots were terrifyingly accurate and used a type of bullet new to the Libyan battlefield.

It was an overcast evening in November 2019. I sat with Muhammad, a militia commander and former engineer in his late forties, in a farmhouse outside the Libyan capital of Tripoli. For months, he and his men had been waging a grinding war against forces led by a renegade general named Khalifa Haftar, who was trying to topple the country’s internationally recognized government.

It had been a static battle whose frontlines barely moved. But in September, Haftar had gained momentum. His firepower became more lethal. His emboldened men seized new territory.

The sudden shift was the handiwork of hundreds of Russian mercenaries from the Wagner Group who had arrived to bolster Haftar’s troops.

An ostensibly private military company, Wagner has, in fact, served as an important tool of power projection for Russian President Vladimir Putin. It has been deployed across the globe, from the Central African Republic and Mozambique to Syria and Ukraine.

The results of these adventures have been mixed. In Libya, however, the Wagner Group made a difference. Morale among the government forces plummeted. Capturing Tripoli appeared within Haftar’s grasp.

This wasn’t the first time that Russia had helped Haftar. Drawn by the promise of energy control and arms deals in this oil-rich state, Moscow had courted and aided the Libyan general for years. All the while, it kept open channels to his government rivals.

To counter the Wagner deployment last fall, the Libyan government turned to Turkey for help. In December, Ankara deployed thousands of Syrian mercenaries to Tripoli—along with advisers, air defenses, artillery, and drones. Aided by this influx, government troops pushed Haftar’s forces out of the capital region.

Moscow quickly pivoted, dispatching advanced combat jets to Haftar’s territory in the east. In tandem, Wagner forces were redeployed across the east and south, including to strategic oil fields.

These moves were part of a broader Russian strategy to gain leverage for a political settlement with Turkey that would establish economic and military spheres of influence while undercutting Europe and the United States. And they starkly illustrated how an opportunistic and scalable military intervention could yield modest strategic gains for Russia.

But the Libyan conflict has carried incalculable human costs. Haftar’s forces are responsible for indiscriminate attacks on civilians, according to the United Nations.

Meanwhile, Western powers have largely stayed on the sidelines. The U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has tacitly endorsed the Libyan general’s assault. Washington is growing frustrated with Haftar’s blockade of oil facilities and alliance with Russia, yet the White House continues to downplay the destructive role of U.S. allies—including Egypt, France, and the United Arab Emirates—in fueling his campaign. France has admonished Turkey for intervening while ignoring the Emirates’ longstanding interference, but Europe as a whole has been too divided and distracted to engage.

For Muhammad, the progovernment Libyan commander, U.S. ambivalence has been especially bitter.

Several years ago, he and the Tripoli government forces received U.S. military aid during a campaign against the self-proclaimed Islamic State. Now they feel abandoned.

“Russia gave Haftar mortars,” he said. “What did Trump give us?”

Progovernment militia fighters on the Tripoli frontlines, during a lull in the battle against forces under the command of General Khalifa Haftar. November 2019.
A fragment of a missile fired from a Chinese-made Wing Loong drone, reportedly operated by the United Arab Emirates in coordination with Russian Wagner personnel to assist Haftar’s Tripoli campaign. June 2019.
The smoldering wreckage of a biscuit factory outside Tripoli, struck several hours before by an alleged Emirati drone on behalf of Haftar’s forces. Ten civilians died in the attack, which the United Nations called a possible war crime. November 2019.
An airstrike by an alleged Emirati drone on a target outside Tripoli. November 2019.
A detention center for irregular migrants in Tripoli. Libya’s thousands of detained migrants face dangers from airstrikes, torture, forced labor, poor sanitation, and now the coronavirus. June 2016.
A progovernment commander on a rooftop during a firefight on the Tripoli frontlines. November 2019.
A progovernment militia fighter fires a recoilless rifle at Haftar’s forces’ positions near the Tripoli International Airport. Like many anti-Haftar fighters hailing from the east, he covers his face because his family is vulnerable to retribution by Haftar’s soldiers. June 2019.
The aftermath of an alleged Emirati airstrike in Tripoli. January 2020.
A progovernment militia fighter works as a mortar spotter against an Islamic State sniper several hundred yards away, during the Battle of Sirte. Many of these same Libyan fighters, who enjoyed U.S. military support during the campaign against the Islamic State, are now battling Haftar’s forces. June 2016.
The rain-soaked frontlines of Tripoli. Many civilian structures have been shelled and thousands of families displaced. Before withdrawing, Russian Wagner forces left booby traps and explosive devices in civilian homes. January 2020.
Photo source: Frederic Wehrey
Frederic Wehrey
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Frederic Wehrey

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    India’s Path to the Big Leagues

    India can play a larger role on the world stage, but it must first restore its economic momentum and liberal credentials.

      Ashley J. Tellis

  • Commentary
    A Coming Decade of Arab Decisions

    As the old order in the Arab world collapses, the region needs governance that can resolve its crises and harness its potential.

      Marwan Muasher, Maha Yahya

  • Commentary
    Reckoning With a Resurgent Russia

    The greatest obstacle to countering Russia’s hard-edged foreign policy has been the West’s incoherent response.

      Andrew S. Weiss, Eugene Rumer

  • Commentary
    A U.S. Foreign Policy for the Middle Class

    The United States must secure the benefits of a globalized economy while protecting itself from systemic shocks and supporting the economic renewal of middle-class communities.

      Rozlyn C. Engel

  • Commentary
    Asia’s Future Beyond U.S.-China Competition

    Beijing and Washington are competing to set Asia’s rules, norms, and standards. But other countries in the region are increasingly choosing to shape its future themselves.

      Evan A. Feigenbaum

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.