China’s Evolution as a Global Power: Lessons from the Bush Administration

{
  "authors": [
    "Evan A. Feigenbaum"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

In The Media

China’s Evolution as a Global Power: Lessons from the Bush Administration

Even before people perceived China as a global player, Beijing was pressed to step up to global responsibilities by the events of September 11, 2001, and the Bush administration’s policies around terrorism and Afghanistan.

By Evan A. Feigenbaum

Published on Nov 20, 2020

Miller Center

About the Author

Evan A. Feigenbaum

Vice President for Studies

Evan A. Feigenbaum is vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he oversees work at its offices in Washington, New Delhi, and Singapore on a dynamic region encompassing both East Asia and South Asia. He served twice as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and advised two Secretaries of State and a former Treasury Secretary on Asia.

Recent Work

Commentary
Is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Performance Art or Meaningful Collaboration?
- Evan A. Feigenbaum
Commentary
In Its Iran War Debate, Washington Has Lost the Plot in Asia
- Evan A. Feigenbaum

North America United States East Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
The U.S. Has Weapons in Space. Now What?
The acknowledgment has sparked fears of a new arms race with China and Russia.
Chris O’Meara
Paper
What Canada Knows About American Power
Smaller powers cannot go it alone, but Canadian history shows that integration with the United States will not always be benign.
Paul Samson
Commentary
Emissary
Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.
The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.
Jeffrey Prescott
Article
Separable, not Separate: Governing Europe’s Collective Defense
European NATO countries are wrestling with the possibility of U.S. disengagement from the alliance. With the continent’s security increasingly uncertain, governments must restore the credibility of their collective defense.
Hans-Dieter Lucas, Adam Thomson, Pierre Vimont
Paper
Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft Power
Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.
Sarah Yerkes

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Emissary

The U.S. Has Weapons in Space. Now What?

The acknowledgment has sparked fears of a new arms race with China and Russia.

Chris O’Meara

Blue Water Bridge with Flags of USA and Canada

Paper

What Canada Knows About American Power

Smaller powers cannot go it alone, but Canadian history shows that integration with the United States will not always be benign.

Paul Samson

Trump holding a glass of champagne up in a toast, with a table of guests in the foreground

Commentary

Emissary

Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.

The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.

Jeffrey Prescott

Article

Separable, not Separate: Governing Europe’s Collective Defense

European NATO countries are wrestling with the possibility of U.S. disengagement from the alliance. With the continent’s security increasingly uncertain, governments must restore the credibility of their collective defense.

Hans-Dieter Lucas, Adam Thomson, Pierre Vimont

Tourists taking photos in front of the White House on a sunny day

Paper

Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft Power

Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.

Sarah Yerkes