• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Amlan Mohanty",
    "Ashima Singh"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "India-U.S. Emerging Technologies Working Group"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [
    "Technology and Society"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Technology",
    "AI"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other
Carnegie India

Advancing the India-U.S. Partnership on AI

Given the importance of AI under the iCET framework, this essay outlines five areas where India and the United States could collaborate to advance their partnership on AI.

Link Copied
By Amlan Mohanty and Ashima Singh
Published on Feb 20, 2024
Project hero Image

Project

Technology and Society

This program focuses on five sets of imperatives: data, strategic technologies, emerging technologies, digital public infrastructure, and strategic partnerships.

Learn More

This essay is part of a series that highlights the main takeaways from discussions that took place at Carnegie India’s eighth Global Technology Summit, co-hosted with the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.


In a midterm review of the India-U.S. initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET), senior officials from both countries reiterated the importance of artificial intelligence (AI) to their strategic bilateral partnership.

Based on closed-door discussions held at the Global Technology Summit 2023 on the sidelines of the iCET review, we outline five areas where India and the United States should collaborate to advance their partnership on AI. 

Developing Common Standards

As founding members of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI), both India and the United States can help build scientific consensus on the nature of the risks emerging from AI systems. A shared understanding of safety risks would help establish a set of common standards to mitigate concerns around bias, privacy, security, and lack of trust.

While some efforts are already underway to develop such standards, more needs to be done. Specifically, there is a need for global benchmarks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of large language models (LLMs) before they can be made available to consumers. Another potential area of collaboration is to develop a common taxonomy for AI systems so that they can be classified and defined based on their primary function and the risk of causing harm.

Given their prior experience in developing standards for the telecom and space sectors, the expectation is that India and the United States will adopt a balanced approach that incentivizes innovation and nurtures a vibrant technology ecosystem while promoting the principles of fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI systems.

Enabling Access to Compute

Access to computing power, more commonly referred to as “compute,” is now a critical geopolitical issue. The scarcity of resources required to run advanced AI systems and the acute concentration of such resources in a few Western countries could lead to an unequal distribution of the benefits of AI between the Global North and the Global South.

India and the United States can play an important role in bridging this new digital divide through a combination of technical innovations, market interventions, and development aid.

A good model is the U.S.-India Global Digital Development Partnership, which promotes the adoption of digital public infrastructure (DPI) in developing countries. India can also share its experience with building DPI for low-resource settings to support AI deployments in regions with limited connectivity.

Promoting Data Sharing

Data sharing between India and the United States can help promote linguistic diversity in popular LLMs such as OpenAI’s GPT-3, which is primarily trained on English-language content.

Both countries possess complementary strengths in this domain. In India, there is a strong push to make local language content readily accessible, while the United States is leading the development of powerful LLMs, which are accessed by millions of people around the world.

An immediate priority is to develop trusted models for cross-border transfers of data, ideally as part of the India-U.S. trade and commercial dialogue and anchored around the implementation of India’s new data protection law.

The hope is that the India-U.S. partnership on data sharing will provide a blueprint for the Global South to develop demographically representative AI models. This could prove especially useful in the African Union, which faces similar challenges due to its multilingual culture.

Enhancing Cybersecurity

India and the United States have a shared interest in using AI for cybersecurity, as recognized with the launch of a Defense Artificial Intelligence Dialogue at the Ministerial Dialogue in April 2022.

On the U.S. side, an executive order issued by President Biden calls on government agencies to examine how AI can be used in cyber defense. But India’s national cybersecurity policy, which is more than a decade old, fails to capture the value of AI in cyber defense and the protection of critical infrastructure.

With AI being elevated to a strategic priority, now is the right time for both countries to collaborate on using AI in intelligence gathering, military training, and counterterrorism.

Innovation and Skilling

Bilateral engagements on AI research and skilling are closely connected. While investment capital is necessary to support foundational breakthroughs, developing and maintaining advanced systems to facilitate such breakthroughs will also require specialized talent. 

In this regard, there is an urgent need for India and the United States to share critical computing resources, research facilities, and datasets. Export barriers for high-performance computing systems must also be removed so that the United States and India can collaborate on the development of supercomputers.

To address the shortage of skilled AI professionals, the easing of H-1B visa requirements for Indians is crucial, along with facilitating deeper cross-border cultural exchanges. Further, academic universities have an important role to play in preparing the workforce for future employment opportunities through skilling programs focused on AI.

Room for Divergence

A strong partnership between India and the United States on AI research, data sharing, cybersecurity, standard setting, compute access, and skilling would go a long way in enhancing the strategic bilateral partnership.

To be sure, both countries may take different paths on some issues. For example, on AI regulation, the United States has adopted a combination of voluntary commitments and reporting requirements, whereas India prefers a light-touch hybrid model. Similarly, both countries may pursue independent efforts to build “sovereign AI infrastructure.”

While such differences may exist, there is great value in both sides committing to certain overarching principles, such as respect for democracy, equitable access, fairness, transparency, and inclusivity. A commitment to these shared values creates a strong foundation for meaningful collaboration to unlock the full potential of AI.

About the Authors

Amlan Mohanty

Fellow, Technology and Society Program

Amlan Mohanty was a fellow with Carnegie India. His areas of expertise include privacy, content policy, platform regulation, competition and AI.

Ashima Singh

Former Research Assistant and Program Coordinator

Ashima Singh is a research assistant and program coordinator in the Technology and Society program at Carnegie India.

Authors

Amlan Mohanty
Fellow, Technology and Society Program
Amlan Mohanty
Ashima Singh
Former Research Assistant and Program Coordinator
TechnologyAISouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Image showing a phone screen with various LLM app icons, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and others.
    Article
    We Need Ongoing Monitoring of AI and Political Information

    Monitoring is essential so that policymakers and the public can understand—and have a say in—how AI systems affect politics.

      • Photo of Danaé Metaxa.
      • Photo of Alex Engler.

      Danaé Metaxa , Alex Engler

  • Robot arm with disposable test tube virus sampling in laboratory
    Commentary
    Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. Sanctions

    Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.

      Xue Gong

  • Two people in blue PPE standing over large metal rolls
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Inside the Global Race to Erode a Battery Manufacturing Monopoly

    Over the past decade, China has moved from marginal player to major producer of all things batteries. The United States, Europe, and others are aiming to balance the market.

      Milo McBride

  • Lee and Lula walking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Why Korea’s President Skipped Washington for Silicon Valley and Brasília

    Lee’s tour shows how Seoul is reorganizing its diplomacy away from Pyongyang and toward industrial networks and the geography of the compute economy.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares

  • An AS3 interceptor part of the Merops, an AI-powered anti-drone system is pictured during a NATO live-fire demonstration of a counter-UAS system on November 18, 2025 in Nowa Deba, Poland.
    Paper
    Confronting the Barriers to AI Diffusion in the U.S. Military

    The Pentagon is calling for a rapid AI transformation. Autonomous drones offer a case study in the eight bottlenecks the U.S. military must navigate to realize that vision.

      Jake Steckler

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.