Assad's Uranium Inventory
IN THIS ISSUE: Assad's uranium inventory, how to revitalize disarmament efforts, Russia, China plan to boost missile defense cooperation, Iran seen stalling on date for nuclear talks, Japan could reprocess nuclear fuel from Korea, legislative review of nuclear-free homeland bill starts.
Mark Hibbs | Arms Control Wonk
At the time the civil war in Syria broke out, the IAEA had not obtained any specific information identifying beyond any doubt where the fuel for Al-Kibar was currently located.
|
 | |
|
|
Sergio Duarte | Carnegie Article
States have reached an impasse over disarmament issues. The standoff is particularly apparent at the Conference on Disarmament, which was meant to be the single multilateral forum for negotiating disarmament when it was created. The body has not achieved a single agreement for over fifteen years. Full Article
RIA Novosti
Russia and China are planning to intensify their cooperation on missile defense in response to America's growing missile defense potential around the globe, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev said on Wednesday. Full Article
Laura Rozen | Al-Monitor
Western diplomats are not encouraged–if not much surprised–by signs Iran is playing games in scheduling a new date for nuclear talks. Iran doesn't seem ready to negotiate, or else is "playing for time," one US administration official told the Back Channel over the weekend. Full Article
Chosun Ilbo
The Japanese government is considering reprocessing spent nuclear fuel rods from Korea, Vietnam and other Asian countries, the Tokyo Shimbun reported Sunday. Full Article
Taipei Times
A draft law on the promotion of a nuclear-free homeland began its review at the legislature yesterday, but Atomic Energy Council Minister Tsai Chuen-horng said the nation would not be able to achieve this goal by 2025 and the Ministry of Economic Affairs said the nation might suffer a power shortage. Full Article
|
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.