Being Realistic About Deep Nuclear Reductions
IN THIS ISSUE: Being realistic about deep nuclear reductions, N. Korea invites IAEA inspectors to return, Kudankulam returns to full strength, P5+1 to meet in Europe this week on Iran, nuclear security cooperation in East Asia, scientific report on nuclear test ban treaty due this month.
Bombs Away? Being Realistic About Deep Nuclear Reductions James Acton | Washington Quarterly
There are about 22,000 nuclear warheads in the world today. Reducing that number eventually to zero is a major element of U.S. President Barack Obama's foreign policy. To date, his administration's progress toward this goal has been modest, even with agreement on a new round of U.S.—Russian cuts with the New START treaty.
|
 | |
|
Steve Herman | Voice of America
North Korea says it is inviting United Nations inspectors to return to the country to monitor the recent agreement with the United States. Full Article
Hindu
Amid tight security, Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant returned to full strength on Tuesday after the Tamil Nadu government gave the go-ahead to the stalled Indo-Russian project with officials hoping the first unit would be commissioned "as soon as possible." Full Article
Laura Rozen | Yahoo! News
Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman will meet with her counterparts from the P5+1 group in Brussels early this week to prepare for upcoming negotiations with Iran, American and European diplomats tell Yahoo News. Full Article
Li Bin | China Daily
The upcoming Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul will explore ways to combat and prevent radiological terrorism in Northeast Asia. The event provides an opportunity for China, Japan and the Republic of Korea to develop concrete cooperation on nuclear security. Full Article
Global Security Newswire
A long-awaited scientific report on technical matters related to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty is to be released at the end of the month. A special panel of the National Research Council is scheduled to issue the results of a three-year study on March 30, according to the committee's website. Full Article
|
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.