China Banks Rein in Support for North Korea
IN THIS ISSUE: China banks rein in support for N. Korea, Senate bill aims to toughen Iran sanctions, Agni-6 with multiple warheads likely by 2017, Eastern US 'well protected' without proposed antimissile site, Paducah laser enrichment plant, Sen. Graham hints at possible compromise on DOE hold.
China Banks Rein in Support for North Korea Simon Rabinovitch | Financial Times
Top Chinese banks have halted most dealings with North Korea, an unprecedented move to use financial leverage against Pyongyang that reflects Beijing's exasperation with Kim Jong-eun's regime.
|
 | |
|
Paul Richter | LA Times
A bipartisan group of senators introduced legislation Wednesday that would sharply toughen U.S. economic sanctions on Iran despite administration calls for Congress to delay penalties that could disrupt diplomacy aimed at resolving the dispute over Iran's nuclear program. Full Article
Ajai Shukla | Business Standard
Ending worldwide speculation about the futuristic Agni-6 missile, the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) has briefed Business Standard about the direction of India's ballistic missile development programme after the Agni-5 enters service, probably in 2015. Full Article
Diane Barnes | Global Security Newswire
The eastern United States is already "well protected" against long-range missile threats without a new interceptor site pushed by some GOP lawmakers, a senior Defense Department official said on Thursday. Full Article
World Nuclear News
Editor's note: We (along with almost everyone else) missed this story when it first came out in February. But it's sufficiently important we believe its inclusion is better late than never. Full Article
Zack Colman | Hill
Graham said he worries the Obama administration might abandon the Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) program, sticking South Carolina with a cache of weapons-grade plutonium and no way to get it out of the state. Full Article
|
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.