Edition

Donald Trump Threatens to 'Totally Destroy' North Korea in UN Speech

IN THIS ISSUE: Donald Trump Threatens to 'Totally Destroy' North Korea in UN Speech, Pentagon Chief Says He Was Asked About Reintroducing Tactical Nuclear Weapons in South Korea, What’s the U.S.’s Best Chance With North Korea? Russia, U.S. Fighter Jets Buzz Border with N.Korea, With Pentagon, State Positions Vacant, Trump Nuclear Review Slows Down, Economic Sanctions and the Nuclear Issue: Lessons From North Korean Trade

Published on September 19, 2017

Donald Trump Threatens to 'Totally Destroy' North Korea in UN Speech 

Julian Borger | Guardian

Donald Trump has threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea, in a bellicose first address to the United Nations general assembly in which he lashed out at a litany of US adversaries and called on “righteous” nations to confront them. The speech was greeted in the UN chamber mostly with silence and occasional outbreaks of disapproving murmurs, as Trump castigated a succession of hostile regimes.

Pentagon Chief Says He Was Asked About Reintroducing Tactical Nuclear Weapons in South Korea

Dan Lamonthe | Washington Post

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis acknowledged Monday that his South Korean counterpart inquired recently about reintroducing tactical nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula, a move that could take tensions with North Korea to a new high. Mattis, speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, confirmed that he and Defense Minister Song Young-moo discussed the weapons during an Aug. 30 visit in Washington. The Pentagon chief did not say whether he’d support such an idea, however. Song has advocated for the move, calling it an “alternative worth a full review.”

What’s the U.S.’s Best Chance With North Korea? Russia

Dmitri Trenin

Russia is usually seen as relatively unimportant to most discussions about the North Korea nuclear crisis, yet it is in a unique position to help de-escalate it. Despite rising tensions between Moscow and Washington—over Russia’s interventions in Crimea and Syria, and the very principles of the world order—Russia has voted twice in recent weeks at the United Nations to impose sanctions on North Korea. In the summer of 2015, in the midst of the crisis over Ukraine, Moscow was careful not to do anything that might derail the Obama administration’s efforts to cinch a nuclear deal with Iran.

U.S. Fighter Jets Buzz Border with N.Korea

Chosun Ilbo

Four U.S. F-35B stealth fighter jets and two B-1B strategic bombers buzzed the aerial border with North Korea in a show of force on Monday amid colorful rhetoric from U.S. President Donald Trump. The jets carried out a live-fire drill at a firing range in Taebaek, Gangwon Province, a military spokesman here said Monday.

With Pentagon, State Positions Vacant, Trump Nuclear Review Slows Down

Paul McLeary | Foreign Policy

North Korea continues to launch ballistic missiles over Japan and puts U.S. territory within range, the U.S. Defense Department is trying to wrap up two critical reports that will outline the Trump administration’s strategy for the nation’s nuclear weapons arsenal and its domestic missile defense programs. But the work has been slowed somewhat by the lack of mid-level officials at the Pentagon and State Department who helped shepherd the previous 2010 nuclear review to completion, according to people with knowledge of the deliberations.

Economic Sanctions and the Nuclear Issue: Lessons From North Korean Trade

Ruediger Frank | 38 North

On September 14, North Korea conducted another test of its Hwasong-12 intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBM), flying over Japan for a second time within a month. This comes on the heels of the North’s sixth nuclear test, the largest it has conducted to date and commonly believed to have been a thermonuclear device. In addition to the political and technical implications of these events, this steady stream of testing continues to destroy devices presumably worth millions of USD by a country that, by all accounts, is having major economic difficulties.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.