Edition

Iran Agrees to Explain Nuclear Detonators to UN

IN THIS ISSUE: Iran agrees to explain nuclear detonators, Russia to build second nuclear power plant in Bushehr, India's first nuclear submarine and ICBM ready for induction in 2015, India, Israel to build anti-missile system, Abe pushes for restarts, 'N. Korea ready for 4th nuclear test.'

Published on February 11, 2014

Iran Agrees to Explain Nuclear Detonators to UN

Mohammad Davari | AFP

Iran agreed Sunday to clarify to the UN atomic agency its need for detonators used in nuclear devices, as part of a probe into allegations of its past weapons work. Mark Hibbs, senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the detonators are "fine wires... designed to perform with exceeding precision and reliability. Without that dependability, the detonations would fail."

Russia to Help Iran Build Second Nuclear Power Plant in Bushehr

Fars News Agency

Russia's Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corporation announced that Tehran and Moscow are negotiating on the construction of a second nuclear power plant in Bushehr.

India's First Nuclear Submarine and ICBM Will be Ready for Induction Next Year: DRDO

Rajat Pandit | Times of India

The Defence Research and Development Organization is planning a flurry of missile and other tests as well as futuristic projects this year.

India, Israel to Build Anti-Missile System

Vivek Raghuvanshi | Defense News

India and Israel will jointly build an integrated anti-missile system to be deployed against Chinese nuclear and conventional missiles.

Nuke Foes' Loss Lets Abe Push for Restarts

Miya Tanaka | Japan Times

The defeat of two anti-nuclear candidates has given the central government a boost of confidence as it prepares to move forward with an energy policy supporting the use of atomic power.

'North Korea Ready for 4th Nuclear Test'

Chung Min-uck | Korea Times

Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin said Monday that North Korea is ready to conduct another nuclear test at its Northeastern site of Punggye-ri.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.