Edition

Pakistan's Dangerous Dysfunction

IN THIS ISSUE: Pakistan's dangerous Dysfunction, no snap checks of Iran's atomic units, run-up to Mideast WMD meeting shows fissures, after quake, VA nuclear plant takes stock, IAEA plan to win backing despite criticism, US ballistic missile intercept test fails.

Published on September 8, 2011
 

Stop Enabling Pakistan's Dangerous Dysfunction

George Perkovich | Carnegie Policy Outlook

Pakistan

As the United States begins to look to the end of its heavy fighting role in Afghanistan, it needs to confront the more important question of Pakistan's future. The United States has been a major player there for sixty years; if Pakistan is dangerously dysfunctional, Washington helped enable it to get this way.

Because withdrawal from Afghanistan means that the United States will be less dependent on Pakistani supply lines into that country, this is a rare opportunity to reconsider and dramatically revise American policies and practices in this strategically important country of almost 200 million.

The United States has frequently cited its interests in Pakistan: securing Pakistan's growing nuclear arsenal; preventing war between it and India; counterterrorism; inducing Pakistan's cooperation in stabilizing Afghanistan; and fostering development and democratization in what will soon be the world's most populous Muslim-majority state. But overwhelmingly, these interests all boil down to one: the security of Pakistanis.

If Pakistanis are more justly governed, more educated, more employed, and therefore more able to define and pursue a constructive national identity and interest, they will expunge terrorists to secure themselves. The United States will be better off as a result. Getting from here to there may be impossible, but it certainly will not happen if the United States continues to treat Pakistan as it has until now: as the means to pursue U.S. security interests outside the country. Full Article   



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
 RSS News Feed Twitter
Footer information begins here

More from Proliferation News


 
 
Related
Khaleej Times
Iran clarified on Tuesday that its offer of allowing "full supervision" of its atomic programme in return for lifting of sanctions does not include snap checks by UN inspectors of its nuclear units.     Full Article

Daniel Horner | Arms Control Today
Efforts to decide on the facilitator and host country for a planned 2012 conference on creating a zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East are hampered by disagreements not only over the individual person and country for those roles, but also over fundamental points of the process for making the choices.     Full Article

 
 
Matthew L. Wald | New York Times
One of the revelations emerging in Dominion's continuing inspections of its quake-shaken North Anna nuclear plant in Mineral, Va., is just why its reactors shut down. Oddly, modernization of the plant, which is filled with devices that were state-of-the-art for the 1970s, may have played a role in the events there.     Full Article

 
 
Fredrik Dahl | Reuters
The U.N. atomic agency's 35-nation governing board is expected next week to endorse steps to boost global nuclear safety in the wake of Japan's Fukushima crisis, even though some disappointed diplomats say the proposals have been watered down     Full Article

Global Security Newswire
A test last week of next-generation ballistic missile intercept technology ended unsuccessfully, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said. A mock short-range ballistic missile was fired at 3:53 a.m. local time on Thursday from the Pacific Missile Range Facility on the Hawaiian island of Kauai.     Full Article
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.