Edition

Safeguards in the Spotlight

IN THIS ISSUE: Safeguards in the spotlight, Iran installs main container of Arak heavy water reactor, San Onofre nuclear power plant to be closed permanently, US tests Iran nuclear 'bunker buster', nuclear sub costs complicate Navy plans, nuclear power's future may hinge on Georgia project.

Published on June 11, 2013

Safeguards in the Spotlight

Mark Hibbs  |  Arms Control Wonk
In general it can be said with authority (and fully backed up by my historical files) that quite a  number of states–and, importantly, mostly states with significant nuclear programs–have at critical times resisted efforts of the IAEA to require that they provide more information and access. 
 

Iran Installs Main Container of Arak Heavy Water Reactor

Fars News Agency
Iran Installed the main and upper container of Arak heavy water reactor in the Central province of Markazi in the presence of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Sunday.
 

San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant to be Closed Permanently

Abby Sewell  | Los Angeles Times
Southern California Edison announced Friday it is permanently shutting down the troubled San Onofre nuclear plant, ending the region's four-decade venture into nuclear energy production.
 

US Tests Iran Nuclear 'Bunker Buster'

Tom Porter | International Business Times
The United States has successfully tested missiles designed to destroy Iran's underground nuclear laboratories. The massive ordnance penetrator, as the weapon is called, has cost $500 million to develop, and can be dropped from B-2 stealth bombers.
 

Nuclear Sub Costs Complicate Navy Plans

Tom Z. Collina | Arms Control Today
In the face of growing federal budget pressures, the U.S. Navy in May began to more openly question Obama administration plans to purchase a dozen new nuclear-armed submarines.
 

Nuclear Power's Future May Hinge on Georgia Project

Matthew L. Wald | New York Times
The Alvin W. Vogtle nuclear power plant near Augusta is using a new plant design, a new construction method and a new system of nuclear regulation for what the industry says is a faster, better and cheaper system that will lead the way for a new generation of reactors.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.