Edition

The United States Still Cautious About Next Steps on North Korea

IN THIS ISSUE: US cautious about next steps on N. Korea, NRC lowers estimate on meltdown, Pakistan opposes fissile material treaty, US pressing for fuel repository deal in Mongolia, Iran, Russia to discuss 'step-by-step' proposal, cuts To defense could hit NM Labs.

Published on August 2, 2011
 

U.S. Still Cautious About Next Steps on North Korea

Lee Chi-dong | Yonhap News Agency

Kim and Bosworth

After "good and constructive" talks with North Korea last week, the United States on Monday maintained a guarded stance on next steps.

U.S. officials neither confirmed nor denied Pyongyang's announcement that the two sides agreed to further dialogue when North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye-gwan and Stephen Bosworth, U.S. special representative for policy on the communist nation, met in New York on Thursday and Friday.

"We thought that these were good meetings, that they were constructive. And we're going to consult with our partners on the way forward," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said at a press briefing.

He added he has nothing to announce yet on Bosworth's potential trips to South Korea, China and Japan to share the results of his talks with Kim. Full Article   



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
RSS News Feed Twitter
Footer information begins here

More from Proliferation News


Matthew L. Wald | New York Times
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is approaching completion of an ambitious study that concludes that a meltdown at a typical American reactor would lead to far fewer deaths than previously assumed. The conclusion, to be published in April after six years of work, is based largely on a radical revision of projections of how much and how quickly cesium 137, a radioactive material that is created when uranium is split, could escape from a nuclear plant after a core meltdown.     Full Article

Associated Press of Pakistan
Reaffirming its opposition to a US-backed treaty to ban production of fissile material used as fuel for nuclear weapons, Pakistan on Thursday warned that it would boycott any process to negotiate that treaty outside the deadlocked UN Conference on Disarmament—the sole negotiating forum for multilateral disarmament. Speaking in the UN General Assembly, Pakistani Ambassador Raza Bashir Tarar struck a "note of caution" against taking negotiations for the Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) outside the 65-member Conference.     Full Article

The Mainichi Daily News
Momentum has been quickly building behind the scenes for an ambitious and controversial project led by the United States and Japan to build a nuclear fuel repository in Mongolia as Washington is trying to secure a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with other countries concerned by the end of this year. The United Arab Emirates has joined the list of countries pursuing the project, and earlier this month the U.S. Department of Energy sounded out other countries concerned about signing a memorandum of understanding on the program by the end of this year.     Full Article

Fars News Agency
Secretary of Russia's Security Council Nikolai Patrushev is scheduled to travel to Tehran on August 15 to confer with Iranian officials on different bilateral and regional issues. During his stay in Iran, the Russian official will hold talks with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili. Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on July 13 had laid out a new "step-by-step" approach that would enable the Islamic Republic to take steps to address the questions raised by the IAEA.     Full Article

John Fleck and Michael Coleman | Albuquerque Journal
The pending federal debt-limit deal raises the possibility of deep defense budget cuts and makes it unlikely that plans for a long-term increase in U.S. nuclear weapons spending will go forward, experts said Monday. The National Nuclear Security Administration's budget is one of the largest federal outlays in New Mexico, supporting work at Los Alamos and Sandia national laboratories to the tune of some $3 billion this year, with plans for substantial increases in coming years.     Full Article

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.