Edition

US Unveils Global Strategy to Commercialize Fusion as Source of Clean Energy During COP28

IN THIS ISSUE: US Unveils Global Strategy to Commercialize Fusion as Source of Clean Energy During COP28, 22 Countries Pledge to Triple Nuclear Capacity in Push to Cut Fossil Fuels, Militant Rocket Hit Base Linked to Israeli Nuclear Missile Program, The Air Force is Expanding a Review of Cancers for Service Members who Worked with Nuclear Missiles, Britain Says No Evidence of Sellafield Nuclear Si

Published on December 5, 2023

US Unveils Global Strategy to Commercialize Fusion as Source of Clean Energy During COP28

JENNIFER MCDERMOTT | Associated Press

The United States will work with other governments to speed up efforts to make nuclear fusion a new source of carbon-free energy, U.S. Climate Envoy John Kerry said Tuesday, the latest of many U.S. announcements the last week aimed at combatting climate change…“We are edging ever-closer to a fusion-powered reality. And at the same time, yes, significant scientific and engineering challenges exist,” Kerry said, in Dubai for U.N. climate talks. “Careful thought and thoughtful policy is going to be critical to navigate this.”

22 Countries Pledge to Triple Nuclear Capacity in Push to Cut Fossil Fuels

Jenny Gross | The New York Times

The United States and 21 other countries pledged on Saturday at the United Nations climate summit in Dubai to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050, saying the revival of nuclear power was critical for cutting carbon emissions to near zero in the coming decades.Proponents of nuclear energy, which supplies 18 percent of electricity in the United States, say it is a clean, safe and reliable complement to wind and solar energy. But a significant hurdle is funding.

Militant Rocket Hit Base Linked to Israeli Nuclear Missile Program

Riley Mellen | The New York Times

A rocket most likely fired by Hamas militants during their Oct. 7 attack on Israel struck an Israeli military base where, experts say, many of the country’s nuclear-capable missiles are based, according to a visual analysis of the attack’s aftermath by The New York Times. While the missiles themselves weren’t hit, the rocket’s impact, at the Sdot Micha base in central Israel, sparked a fire that approached missile storage facilities and other sensitive weaponry.

The Air Force is Expanding a Review of Cancers for Service Members who Worked with Nuclear Missiles

TARA COPP | Associated Press

The Air Force is expanding its study of whether service members who worked with nuclear missiles have had unusually high rates of cancer after a preliminary review determined that a deeper examination is needed. The initial study was launched in response to reports that many who served are now ill. The Air Force isn’t making its initial findings of cancer numbers public for a month or so, but released its initial assessment Monday that more review is necessary. “We’ve determined that additional study is warranted” based on preliminary analyses of the data, said Lt. Col. Keith Beam, one of several Air Force medical officers who updated reporters on the service’s missile community cancer review.

Britain Says No Evidence of Sellafield Nuclear Site Hacking

Reuters 

Britain has no records or evidence to suggest that networks at the Sellafield nuclear site were the victim of a successful cyber attack by state actors, the government said on Monday following a report by the Guardian newspaper. The Guardian reported that Sellafield, which carries out nuclear fuel reprocessing, nuclear waste storage and decommissioning, had been hacked by cyber groups closely linked to Russia and China.

New Information Tool on Nuclear Weapons Seeks to Identify the Next Arms Control Strategies

Andrew Facini | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 

To help put today’s trends in their historical context, a team of the Council on Strategic Risks (CSR) developed a new visualization tool and information system that maps every type of nuclear weapon fielded by the five nuclear weapons states (P5) under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—from their inception to present day.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.