• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Edition

Why Beijing Stands by Pyongyang

IN THIS ISSUE Why Beijing stands by Pyongyang, North Korean nuclear test more than twice as powerful as last blast, Saenuri calls for nuclear capability to deter the North, U.S. nuclear complex security oversight centralized, diplomats say Iran starts upgrade of nuclear site, and RWE boss warns over nuclear plant subsidies

Link Copied
Published on February 21, 2013

Proliferation News

Proliferation News is a biweekly newsletter highlighting the latest analysis and trends in the nuclear policy community.

Learn More
 
 
In This Issue
Why Beijing Stands by Pyongyang
Wall Street Journal
North Korean Nuclear Test More Than Twice as Powerful as Last Blast
Global Security Newswire
Saenuri Calls for Nuclear Capability to Deter the North
Korea JoongAng Daily
U.S. Nuclear Complex Security Oversight Centralized
Global Security Newswire
Diplomats: Iran Starts Upgrade of Nuclear Site
National Public Radio
RWE Boss Warns Over Nuclear Plant Subsidies
Guardian

Why Beijing Stands by Pyongyang

Lora Saalman | Wall Street Journal

North Korea Soldiers

On the heels of North Korea's third nuclear test, speculation aboun ds that China has reached a new height of embarrassment and frustration over its neighbor's intransigence. The thinking goes that Beijing's new leadership will undertake a more active role on the North Korean nuclear issue. However, this view underestimates Beijing's strong preference for multilateral negotiations and for the kind of stability its leaders see as necessary for economic growth. It also misses the depth of Beijing's aversion to the use of force or sanctions.  Full Article



Follow the Nuclear Policy Program
RSS News Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Footer information begins here
More from Proliferation News


North Korean Nuclear Test More Than Twice as Powerful as Last Blast
Rachel Oswald | Global Security Newswire
James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace concluded the North's third nuclear test took place in the same tunnel at Punggye-ri and at nearly the same depth as the 2009 blast. From this, he calculated the most recent detonation had an explosive power 2.5 times larger than the prior trial. Acton and other scientists emphasize that estimations at this point are preliminary.     Full Article

Saenuri Calls for Nuclear Capability to Deter the North
Lee Eun-joo | Korea JoongAng Daily
Some lawmakers of the ruling Saenuri Party yesterday intensified their hardline stance on North Korea, calling on Seoul to establish its own nuclear deterrence capability to cope with the growing threat from Pyongyang.     Full Article

U.S. Nuclear Complex Security Oversight Centralized
Diane Barnes | Global Security Newswire
The United States is overhauling oversight of security at atomic arms facilities in light of last year's infiltration of a Tennessee site housing much of the nation's nuclear-bomb fuel, a top U.S. official said on Wednesday.    Full Article

Diplomats: Iran Starts Upgrade of Nuclear Site
National Public Radio
Tehran has started installing high-tech machines at its main uranium enrichment site that are capable of accelerating production of reactor fuel and — with further upgrading — the core of nuclear warheads, diplomats said Wednesday.Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency saw close to 100 or more machines mounted when they toured the site a few days ago. Depending on experts' estimates, the new-generation centrifuges can enrich uranium three to five times faster than Iran's present working model.     Full Article

RWE Boss Warns Over Nuclear Plant Subsidies
Terry Macalister and Richard Cookson | Guardian
RWE npower, one of the big six power suppliers, has warned ministers not to seal a long-term subsidy deal with the nuclear industry behind the backs of consumers and saddle them with "unnecessarily high bills" for the next 40 years.    Full Article

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.