• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

Tonnes of Fun

There are over 3,700 metric tons of plutonium and highly-enriched uranium in global stockpiles, according to a recent report by the Institute for Science and International Security.

Link Copied
By Ben Bain
Published on Sep 12, 2005
Program mobile hero image

Program

Nuclear Policy

The Nuclear Policy Program aims to reduce the risk of nuclear war. Our experts diagnose acute risks stemming from technical and geopolitical developments, generate pragmatic solutions, and use our global network to advance risk-reduction policies. Our work covers deterrence, disarmament, arms control, nonproliferation, and nuclear energy.

Learn More

There are over 3,700 metric tons of plutonium and highly-enriched uranium in global stockpiles, according to a recent report by the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS).  Global Stocks  of Nuclear Explosive Materials, authored by David Albright and Kimberly Kramer, says that these materials, together with the 140 tonnes of Neptunium 237 and Americium, are enough for over 300,000 nuclear weapons. 

The report estimates that at the end of 2003, 50 countries held a total of 1,900 tonnes of HEU, with nine of those countries in possession of at least 1 tonne.  Nearly 91 percent of global HEU is in military stockpiles.  According to the report, “stocks of civil HEU are decreasing as HEU is blended down into low enriched uranium” and by 2020, “the number of countries with a kilogram of HEU could decrease from about 50 to no more than 10 or 20 countries,” due to take-back programs initiated by the United States and Russia to consolidate civil HEU stocks. 

Over the next 15 years, global stocks of separated civil plutonium will not decrease significantly.  In fact, the report says, despite the “consensus in the international community that stockpiles of separated plutonium should be minimized because they are a proliferation hazard,” currently “the amount of separated (unirradiated) civil plutonium in the world continues to increase.”  At the end of 2003, 25 countries had at least 5 tonnes of plutonium.  Problems that will lead to continued unirradiated plutonium increases “include the separation of more plutonium than can be used, delays in gaining approvals in loading MOX fuel, and the impact of unexpected events such as nuclear accidents or incidents that further delay MOX programs.”

The ISIS report also estimates the number of potential nuclear weapons Israel, India, Pakistan, and the DPRK could build from estimated fissile material stockpiles through the end of 2003.  Israel is believed to have the capability to produce around 145 nuclear weapons, whereas India and Pakistan could produce around 80 and 70 respectively.  Estimates vary for the DPRK, ranging from 3-9 weapons. 

The study also notes that “separated plutonium and both separated and irradiated HEU in [certain] countries…are of special concern because of the risk of diversion for use by terrorists.” Russia, Pakistan, and North Korea are some of the “most important to understand and secure.”  

The report provides detailed tables and charts on national and global holdings.

About the Author

Ben Bain

Former Junior Fellow, Nonproliferation Project

Ben Bain
Former Junior Fellow, Nonproliferation Project
Nuclear PolicyNuclear Energy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers a speech during the graduation ceremony at the National Defense Academy of Japan on March 14, 2026 in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
    Article
    Revisiting Japan’s Non-Nuclear Principles: Between a Nuclear Allergy and Umbrella

    Japan’s prime minister, Takaichi Sanae, may kickstart a discussion on Japan’s non-nuclear principles.

      Shizuka Kuramitsu

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?

    French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe on Iran: Gone with the Wind

    Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.

      Pierre Vimont

  • Nuclear power plant reactor construction
    Article
    Promoting Responsible Nuclear Energy Conduct: An Agenda for International Cooperation

    These principles aim to codify core responsible practices and establish a common universal platform of high-level guidelines necessary to build trust that a nuclear energy resurgence can deliver its intended benefits.

      Ariel (Eli) Levite, Toby Dalton

  • Research
    The Unintended Consequences of German Deterrence

    Germany's sometimes ambiguous nuclear policy advocates nuclear weapons for deterrence purposes but at the same time adheres to non-proliferation. This dichotomy can turn into a formidable dilemma and increase proliferation pressures in Berlin once no nuclear protector is around anymore, a scenario that has become more realistic in recent years.

      Ulrich Kühn

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.