• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
A Return to Business as Usual in Franco-American Relations

Source: Getty

Article

A Return to Business as Usual in Franco-American Relations

The impact that America’s next president will have on various areas of French national interests will likely be less significant than in the past.

Link Copied
By Ronald Hatto
Published on Oct 31, 2012

France was energized by the 2008 U.S. presidential election in a way that had never been seen before, and may never be seen again. The unilateral foreign policy and anti-French rhetoric of the presidency of George W. Bush had seen Franco-American relations hit all-time lows. The reaction was a massive majority across France expressing its support and enthusiasm for Barack Obama, a candidate with whom it could far more easily identify.

Four years later, however, much has changed in French domestic politics, and in the country’s foreign policy. With a new president in office, and the country facing an economic crisis of unprecedented intensity, France’s attention has turned decidedly inward. Obama may still be France’s favorite candidate, but the novelty has worn off.

The Iraq episode in particular is important in understanding why both French elites and the French public supported Barack Obama in such overwhelming numbers in 2008. Then secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld drew heavy criticism in 2003 for his pision of Europe into “old,” countries that were opposed to the invasion of Iraq, and “new,” countries that supported U.S. intervention. Rumsfeld’s statements hit a nerve with French decisionmakers in particular, and the relationship between France and the United States rapidly soured.

Another reason for France’s support of Obama—or rather its support of America’s Democratic Party—is found in the organization of the French political system. Observers of its politics will note that France has had a succession of strongly interventionist governments since at least 1945. France’s traditional right-wing parties are no less interventionist in terms of social protection than their opponents on the left. The French people are so used to Keynesian-style economic policy from their governments that it is almost unimaginable for a liberal government, in the European, classical sense of the term, to take power. In U.S. elections, therefore, the French tend to identify with the candidate who favors stronger social policies—this year, as often, the Democrats.

The French policy environment has changed significantly in recent years with a reorientation of focus for French public opinion, shifting from a wider interest in international affairs to an increasing preoccupation with domestic politics. In 2008, recently elected president Nicolas Sarkozy was keen to improve the desperate state of Franco-American relations. Sarkozy wanted France to return to NATO’s integrated command, and was ready to increase France’s participation in Afghanistan. Transatlantic relations were placed at the forefront of French foreign policy, a fact that was clearly stated in France’s 2008 defense white paper.

Since his election as president in May this year, François Hollande has been focused on the economy, which he has seen as vital for establishing his authority and legitimacy. The financial crisis had a significant impact in France as in so many other economies in Europe and this is unsurprising. France is currently shaken by the specter of a steadily climbing unemployment rate, which recently topped 3 million for the first time since June 1999. The new government is therefore far more preoccupied with trying to address the worst effects of the crisis and avoid any possible social unrest.

Moreover, the withdrawal of French forces from Afghanistan is now well underway. French casualties in Afghanistan have dramatically declined since June 2012, and by the end of this year the French contingent’s presence in in the country will be very limited. As the period of close U.S.-French military cooperation in Afghanistan comes to an end, this is one additional reason why many in France have less interest in scrutinizing the evolution of U.S. policy. The increased political focus on engagement with emerging countries such as Brazil, China, and India has added to this lack of interest.

The impact that America’s next president will have on various areas of French national interests—including Afghanistan, the global financial crisis, and relations with emerging powers—will likely be less significant than in the past. Relative apathy in France with respect to the U.S. elections is therefore not an illustration of ignorance of American political life. If anything, the current situation may be just a return to business as usual, as the French together with their European partners learn to deal with their own problems, and not wait for the Americans.

Ronald Hatto is a senior lecturer at Sciences-Po in Paris, currently attached to the Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Internationales (CERI).

About the Author

Ronald Hatto

Ronald Hatto
EuropeNorth AmericaForeign Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing It

    Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky (R) and Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk attend a press conference at the Mariinskyi Palace in Kyiv on February 5, 2026, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
    Article
    Kindred Nations, Uneasy Neighbors: Polish-Ukrainian Relations in the Crucible of Russia’s War

    The full-scale invasion cemented Ukraine’s determination to sever its ties with Russia; reimagining the Poland-Ukraine partnership can accelerate Kyiv’s westward alignment and improve the security of both countries.

      Eric Green

  • Commentary
    Southeast Asia’s Agency Amid the New Oil Crisis

    There is no better time for the countries of Southeast Asia to reconsider their energy security than during this latest crisis.

      Gita Wirjawan

  • Commentary
    Fuel Crisis Forces Politically Perilous Trade-Offs in Indonesia

    As conflict in the Middle East drives up fuel costs across Asia, Indonesia faces difficult policy trade-offs over subsidies, inflation, and fiscal credibility. President Prabowo’s personalized governance style may make these hard choices even harder to navigate.

      Sana Jaffrey

  • Commentary
    Europe Doesn’t Like War—for Good Reasons

    The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are existential threats to Europe as a peace project. Leaders and citizens alike must reaffirm their solidarity to face up to today’s multifaceted challenges.

      Marc Pierini

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.