Optimal Deterrence: How the United States Can Preserve Peace and Prevent a Nuclear Arms Race with China and Russia

Acton, James M.

Research

Optimal Deterrence: How the United States Can Preserve Peace and Prevent a Nuclear Arms Race with China and Russia

The United States should optimize its nuclear strategy—to maximize the deterrence benefits of its nuclear arsenal while reducing the risks of arms racing, escalation, and proliferation as well as the costs of modernization.

By James M. Acton

Published on Jun 18, 2025

Read the Publication

About the Author

James M. Acton

Jessica T. Mathews Chair, Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program

Acton holds the Jessica T. Mathews Chair and is co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Recent Work

Commentary
What the New Democratic Congress Can (and Can’t) Do on Foreign Policy
- +10
  James M. Acton, Dan Baer, Mark Baldassare, …
Paper
Nuclear Weapons and the Future of American Power
- James M. Acton, Ankit Panda

United States Nuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
After the Midterm Rout, Can Trump Change Course Without Giving Up Tariffs?
Even if the administration maintains its broader trade policy, it should use tariffs more strategically and work with U.S. partners, not against them.
Barbara Weisel
Commentary
Emissary
What the New Democratic Congress Can (and Can’t) Do on Foreign Policy
Democrats now have the gavel and the purse, but the executive branch still pulls the levers on the U.S. role in the world.
+10
James M. Acton, Dan Baer, Mark Baldassare, …
Commentary
Emissary
How a U.S.-Russia Standoff Ended a Decades-Old UN Mission in Western Sahara
MINURSO’s renewal by the Security Council became highly politicized. Its expiration brings concerns about renewed violence and the future of demining efforts.
Sarah Yerkes
Commentary
Emissary
Three Ways the New Democratic Congress Could Constrain Trump on Foreign Policy
How Capitol Hill might reassert checks on the executive branch.
Jennifer Hendrixson White
Article
Nuclear Deterrence Needs to Account for Domestic Politics
Individual leaders and public attitudes—especially in democracies—matter for credibility.
Lauren Sukin, Samuel Seitz

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Trump sitting at a desk next to a red hat that says VETO

Commentary

Emissary

After the Midterm Rout, Can Trump Change Course Without Giving Up Tariffs?

Even if the administration maintains its broader trade policy, it should use tariffs more strategically and work with U.S. partners, not against them.

Barbara Weisel

Commentary

Emissary

What the New Democratic Congress Can (and Can’t) Do on Foreign Policy

Democrats now have the gavel and the purse, but the executive branch still pulls the levers on the U.S. role in the world.

- +10
James M. Acton, Dan Baer, Mark Baldassare, …

military personnel standing around a helicopter

Commentary

Emissary

How a U.S.-Russia Standoff Ended a Decades-Old UN Mission in Western Sahara

MINURSO’s renewal by the Security Council became highly politicized. Its expiration brings concerns about renewed violence and the future of demining efforts.

Sarah Yerkes

Commentary

Emissary

Three Ways the New Democratic Congress Could Constrain Trump on Foreign Policy

How Capitol Hill might reassert checks on the executive branch.

Jennifer Hendrixson White

Article

Nuclear Deterrence Needs to Account for Domestic Politics

Individual leaders and public attitudes—especially in democracies—matter for credibility.

Lauren Sukin, Samuel Seitz