As economists and politicians weave elaborate explanations about the causes of the current financial crisis, from greed to deregulation, it is worth articulating the vital role that corporate governance—or rather the lack of it—has played. According to Rainer Geiger, OECD Regional Advisor for the Middle East, “The crisis provides an opportunity for change. With corporate governance, it is not only the rules that matter, but the practice of them.” Clearly, the practice has fallen far short, and improving it rests as much on high ethical standards as it does on laws and regulations. Just as the Asian crisis of the late 1990’s and the Enron debacle highlighted the dire need for improved corporate governance, recent market failures should provoke re-evaluation of corporate governance standards and their implementation. This is not an easy argument to make at this moment, when the very fundamentals of free market capitalism are under attack.
The Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance, and Change in the Middle East
Does the current financial crisis undermine the credibility of corporate governance efforts--or prove they are needed now more than ever?
More work from Sada
- Q&AWhy Countries Keep Making Deals With Trump, Despite the Supreme Court Tariff Case
And how the tariffs are one more example of the president’s increasing power over foreign policy.
- commentaryA War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation
Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.
- Samar Sulaiman
- commentarySouth Korea’s APEC Moment
Seoul is aiming to advance its regional governance in an era of competition—and trying to get other middle powers to follow its lead.
- commentaryDisarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?
The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.
- Souhayb Jawhar
- commentaryA War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation
Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.
- Samar Sulaiman





