The Iraqi Parliament was presented with a draft of the country’s permanent constitution on August 28, almost two weeks after the original August 15 deadline. In his latest commentary on Iraq’s constitutional process, Nathan Brown analyzes the legal shortcomings of the process, the failure to achieve consensus, and the impact of the draft on the prospects for peaceful political reconstruction in Iraq.
Published on September 2, 2005
More work from Carnegie
- researchReintegrating Iraqis Returning Home After Conflict: Lessons from Variation Between Four Communities
Return policies and reintegration programming must consider the specificities of local communities and their internal dynamics.
- Mara Revkin,
- Benjamin Krick,
- Raed Aldulaimi
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research - articleCan Democracy Survive the Disruptive Power of AI?
AI models enable malicious actors to manipulate information and disrupt electoral processes, threatening democracies. Tackling these challenges requires a comprehensive approach that combines technical solutions and societal efforts.
- researchCivic Activism in an Intensifying Climate Crisis
To address the deepening climate crisis, climate activism is employing a wider variety of tactics and aiming at a broader set of goals. In response, the movement faces stronger repression and civic backlash against climate action.
- Erin Jones,
- Richard Youngs
- articleYoon’s Failed Political Coup and South Korea’s Mounting Crisis
Yoon’s martial law decree lasted only three hours, but the ramifications for his political future and the country’s political divide will go on much longer.
- researchRussia in the Middle East and North Africa—Disrupting Washington’s Influence and Redefining Moscow’s Global Role
The agency of MENA states and nonstate actors and their multilayered interactions with the United States, China, Russia, and the EU have helped shape the complex outcomes of the great power competition.