• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Balázs Jarábik"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine",
    "Europe",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s Second Act

A Zelenskiy presidency would offer a precious opportunity for a rethink. It’s time for Ukraine—and its backers in the West—to get serious.

Link Copied
By Balázs Jarábik
Published on Apr 18, 2019
Program mobile hero image

Program

Europe

The Europe Program in Washington explores the political and security developments within Europe, transatlantic relations, and Europe’s global role. Working in coordination with Carnegie Europe in Brussels, the program brings together U.S. and European policymakers and experts on strategic issues facing Europe.

Learn More

Source: Politico Europe

In Ukraine, the time for jokes is over.

With an incredibly successful blitz campaign, television satirist Volodymyr Zelenskiy has captured the support of the vast majority of Ukrainians and appears poised to become the country’s next president in the election’s second round of voting Sunday.

The fictional president he plays in the satirical TV series “Servant of the People” gave millions a sense of hope that politics can be different. Now, we’re about to witness a truly unique political project: a reality show in which everyone gets to participate.

The moment Ukrainians believed Zelenskiy could win, it was all over for incumbent President Petro Poroshenko.

A representative of the old system, Poroshenko could not change his tactics — but, as a joke in Kiev goes, he never worked so diligently as under the threat of a Zelenskiy presidency.

The showman’s political program is deliberately general so he can be seen as a centrist figure.

The president was fighting Mission Impossible: His policies backed nation-building and the war, instead of a better economy and governance. But Ukrainians are fed up with the war and the status quo. A huge number of voters — 88 percent of Zelenskiy’s supporters and even 76 percent of Poroshenko’s — say they want radical changes in Ukraine, according to polls.

Delivering on that demand won’t be easy. We know Zelenskiy is a shoo-in for the presidency, but we don’t know what his presidency will look like.

Zelenskiy's agenda is still somewhat murky, but there are several key elements to his political vision: direct democracy (he wants to pass a law on referendums), a 5 percent tax amnesty and new, tighter rules for oligarchs.

He is also calling for a new focus on the state’s role in service delivery while cutting the state’s direct (read, restrictive) impact on citizens. He has made numerous pledges to continue working with the International Monetary Fund — understandably, as Ukraine has to pay back almost $36 billion to foreign creditors in 2019-2021. He also has positioned himself as a supporter of Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic integration.

But for the most part, Zelenskiy has been an effective performer, avoiding offering anything of substance on most issues and walking a tightrope not to alienate any one group of Ukrainian voters, except true Poroshenko believers.

The showman’s political program is deliberately general so he can be seen as a centrist figure — Ukraine’s answer to French President Emmanuel Macron. If he’s had smooth ride so far, it’s not just the result of luck, but of smart political strategy.

Things are about to get much tougher for him. Zelenskiy’s window of opportunity to make an impact on key issues that have rallied Ukrainians behind him is actually pretty small.

Ukraine has a mixed political system; the president needs the cooperation of parliament to make policy. Unless Zelenskiy shows that he can make the opaque party system work for him, his popularity will invariably suffer.

The next big hurdle will be parliamentary elections in October. Zelenskiy will try to follow in the footsteps of France’s Macron and Armenia’s new prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, to break the national party system. He will try to win big by building a more inclusive, regionally balanced party and pushing the idea of direct democracy by engaging voters in town hall meetings (à la Macron) and via social networks (like Pashinyan).

He’ll face fierce opposition, including from Yulia Tymoshenko — a fellow presidential candidate and notorious political survivor — and Poroshenko. On the other hand, many of the country’s oligarchs, have been gravitating toward the winner. Their support is likely to be crucial to him being able to get anything done. If Zelenskiy can hold on to their backing, he may be able to use this window to push through some long overdue changes.

A Zelenskiy presidency would offer a precious opportunity for a rethink. It’s time for Ukraine — and its backers in the West — to get serious.

Zelenskiy will need to distinguish himself from the Poroshenko era ahead of October’s parliamentary elections. That means first and foremost dealing with Ukraine’s two least reformed institutions and the pillars of Poroshenko’s consolidation of power: the General Prosecutor's Office and the secret services (SBU). The people the new president nominates to head these institutions will be the first signs of his true intentions.

Another colossal challenge will be the continuing war in Donbas. As president, Zelenskiy’s immediate objective won’t be an aggressive push to reintegrate the region, a move that would spark serious resistance at home and from Russia, but rather to freeze the conflict. Attempting to heal the rift with Ukraine’s Western neighbors such as Hungary, Poland and Romania over language, identity and memory politics would also give him quick diplomatic “victories.”

Zelenskiy’s biggest challenge will be the same as that of his predecessors: How to break up a system based on (extreme) redistribution to the rich, while private monopolies led by oligarchs keep the state as weak as possible.

The high expectations that followed the pro-Western Maidan protest of 2014, when an oligarch went on to win the elections, were misplaced. A Zelenskiy presidency would offer a precious opportunity for a rethink. It’s time for Ukraine — and its backers in the West — to get serious.

This article was originally published by POLITICO Europe.

About the Author

Balázs Jarábik

Political analyst, former Slovak diplomat, and consultant specializing in Eastern Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Moldova’s Ruling Party PAS Must Graduate From Crisis Management to State Governance

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Belarus Is a Test Case for Ukraine’s New Role in the Region

      Balázs Jarábik

Balázs Jarábik

Political analyst, former Slovak diplomat, and consultant specializing in Eastern Europe

Balázs Jarábik
Eastern EuropeUkraineEuropeIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?

    Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European Order
    Report
    Europe from Scratch: Visions for a New European Order

    As the EU confronts profound challenges, several leaders have called for fundamental reform to the union’s model—but only modest, superficial changes have resulted. What if Europe really could be reimagined from zero today: What should such a redesigned European order look like?

      Richard Youngs, ed.

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Should We Take From Andrey Melnichenko’s Essay in the Economist?

    Andrey Melnichenko’s essay offers no answer to the fundamental question of how, under any kind of negotiated settlement, Europe can protect itself from the Russian ressentiment that is inevitable in all scenarios except for an outright victory for Putin.

      Leonid Bershidsky

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Sycophancy Worked on Trump

    Nearly a year and a half after Europeans leaned into sucking up to Trump, the strategy has produced some benefits when it comes to Ukraine.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Romania Bulgaria Turkey Black Sea naval
    Commentary
    How NATO Became Anchored in the Black Sea

    As Russia's war on Ukraine drags on, NATO is expanding its footprint in the Black Sea. Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria are upgrading their fleets and deepening trilateral cooperation.

      Dimitar Bechev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.