• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Jin Liangxiang",
    "Maha Yahya",
    "Hesham Alghannam"
  ],
  "type": "questionAnswer",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Carnegie China Commentaries"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

Q&A
Carnegie China

China’s Evolving Economic and Security Role in the Middle East

The advantage that China has over other global powers, especially America, is that its foreign policy is closely aligned with those of many of the Middle Eastern countries.

Link Copied
By Jin Liangxiang, Maha Yahya, Hesham Alghannam
Published on Mar 20, 2024

This Q&A was adapted from a Carnegie China live event assessing China–Middle East relations. It has been edited for clarity.

Jin Liangxiang: The Middle East is an important market for China’s products and a major source for Chinese investment. Peace and stability are an important part of China’s Middle East policy. It wants the market to be stable.

Also, China cares about its international image as a responsible major country. Arab and Western countries, including the United States, often claim that China should play a responsible role in the Middle East. China is living up to this commitment, but it has a different way of defining its responsibilities.

On regional security issues, China emphasizes common, cooperative, comprehensive, and sustainable security. The American way of promoting security in the Middle East has failed. The Americans say that they will protect Saudi Arabia, but this puts Iran on the other side. Iran is not satisfied with being targeted by the United States. China’s principle is different. [It] thinks that security should be common and comprehensive.

Security issues should be resolved by regional countries themselves. Outsiders can push regional countries to engage in dialogue, particularly by leveraging economic and political capital. That is the way to make peace and security.

Saudi-Iran reconciliation has been very important for the Middle East. There are many conflicts in the region, but tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia are one of the defining features. By facilitating reconciliation, China has helped maintain a modest degree of stability in the region. It stopped the confrontation between Saudi Arabi and Iran in Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, and Bahrain. This has benefited Saudi Arabia greatly. Saudi Arabia has strong interests in reconciliation with Iran because of its ambitious plan for Vision 2030. Without reconciliation, Saudi Arabia cannot realize this agenda. Reconciliation has led many people to see the prospect for stability in the region.

Our friends in Saudi Arabia sometimes complain that China has closer relations with Iran. But when we are in Iran, they ask why we side with Saudi Arabia. Both arguments are wrong. China tries to maintain balanced and good relations with both countries.

Maha Yahya: Dr. Alghannam, having heard what Dr. Jin said, particularly regarding China’s interests in economic stability and stability in the region, what would you say are the key security concerns in the Middle East and how does China fit into the regional security landscape?

Hesham Alghannam: First is the ongoing Israeli occupation of Palestinian Arab land, which has escalated tensions in the region and brought it to the brink of a broader conflict beyond Gaza and the West Bank. Second, there is the issue of the spread of nuclear weapons in the region. Israel already possesses nuclear weapons, and Iran is nearing a nuclear capability. This will encourage others, including the Turks and the Saudis, to pursue nuclear armament. Third, the existence of numerous armed nonstate actors backed by Iran poses a threat to Arab states and undermines stability across the region.

Addressing these strategic security challenges requires a comprehensive strategy. For instance, resolving the Iranian nuclear program necessitates addressing Israel’s nuclear capability. Similarly, tackling the proliferation of armed nonstate actors requires addressing the root causes that enable their existence.

However, the current approach, such as the NATO-like defense pact proposed by the United States, does not offer comprehensive solutions to ongoing security concerns. While such pacts may enhance Saudi Arabia’s security, they do not address the core security issues.

In contrast, China advocates a different approach to regional security. It emphasizes cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Iran. This approach has led to significant mediation efforts aimed at reconciling the two states.

Unlike the United States, China has shown no interest in establishing military bases in the region until now. China’s political involvement in the region remains limited. However, like the United States, China lacks a comprehensive strategy that addresses the main security challenges in the region, such as the ending the conflict in Gaza.

The advantage that China has over other global powers, especially America, is that its foreign policy is closely aligned with those of many of the Middle Eastern countries. Unlike the United States, China’s foreign policy principles are grounded in values such as respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, nonaggression, noninterference, mutual benefit, and peaceful existence. China also refrains from interference under the pretext of protecting human rights or promoting democracy. It has avoided employing double standards in international relations. This is how many states in the region view China, so it is not strange that China’s foreign policy is more attractive to leaders in the Middle East.

About the Authors

Jin Liangxiang

Jin Liangxiang is a senior research fellow at Shanghai Institutes of International Studies.

Maha Yahya

Director, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Maha Yahya is director of the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center, where her research focuses on citizenship, pluralism, and social justice in the aftermath of the Arab uprisings.

Hesham Alghannam

Nonresident Scholar, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Hesham Alghannam is a nonresident scholar at the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center.

Authors

Jin Liangxiang

Jin Liangxiang is a senior research fellow at Shanghai Institutes of International Studies.

Jin Liangxiang
Maha Yahya
Director, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Maha Yahya
Hesham Alghannam
Nonresident Scholar, Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
Hesham Alghannam
Middle EastEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Channels of China’s Currency Promotion in Gulf Markets

    Is the Gulf moving beyond the dollar? This article examines how China is expanding the renminbi's role across Gulf markets, what that means for regional finance, and why the future of global currencies is more complex than the de-dollarization debate suggests.

      Andrew Bonney

  • Paper
    Assessing Information Ecosystems: How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats

    The hybrid warfare landscape is evolving rapidly, leaving policymakers without clear strategies. To better inform their work in addressing emerging challenges, governments must dig deeper into the underlying dynamics at play.

      Raluca Csernatoni, Alicia Wanless

  • Two women walking in front of thick black smoke
    Commentary
    In the War with Iran, Targeting Energy Infrastructure Has Outsized Impact on Civilians

    Acknowledging these harms strengthens the case for ethical limits on the weaponization of critical infrastructure.

      • Andrew Leber

      Alia Sajjadian, Andrew Leber

  • This photo obtained by AFP from the Iranian news agency Tasnim shows an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) boat allegedly taking part in an operation to seize ships attempting to cross the Strait of Hormuz, on April 21, 2026.
    Paper
    The Hormuz Conflict and the Limits of Renminbi Internationalization

    Potential Strait of Hormuz transit “fees” and Iran’s renminbi use are bringing attention to Beijing’s push to become a “financial power,” particularly in energy markets. Underdeveloped aspects of China’s financial system and its dollar dependencies still constrain the renminbi’s geoeconomic significance, but recent events may spur policy shifts aimed at changing these dynamics.

      Robert Greene

  • Trump and MBS walking through a doorway
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What We Know About the U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Deal

    Despite the agreement’s uncertainty, it’s still a significant development in regional and nuclear policy.

      • Andrew Leber
      • Jane Darby Menton

      Andrew Leber, Jane Darby Menton

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.