Judy Dempsey
{
"authors": [
"Judy Dempsey"
],
"type": "commentary",
"blog": "Strategic Europe",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Europe",
"Western Europe",
"Germany"
],
"topics": [
"EU",
"Migration",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Wandering Refugees
Germany is doing everything possible to maintain its humanitarian and moral principles toward refugees. But Berlin can no longer do it alone.
Carnegie Europe was on the ground at the 2016 Munich Security Conference, offering readers exclusive access to the debates as they unfolded and providing insights on today’s most urgent international issues. Check out our live coverage here.
*
Peter Altmaier cuts an impressive figure. As Angela Merkel’s chief of staff—as if that were not enough on his plate—Altmaier is responsible for coordinating his boss’s greatest challenge since she became German chancellor in 2005: the refugee crisis.
Merkel had just ended talks with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Kiev, followed by a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, to try to forge a ceasefire agreement in eastern Ukraine. She then flew to Munich to explain her position and project a leadership that has kept Europe united over its policy toward Russia.
This year, the continuing war in Syria and the huge impact that the refugee crisis is having on the region—but also on Europe and particularly on Germany—is topping the agenda. Again, Germany has taken the lead, this time without its EU allies.
Altmaier, who said (perhaps feigning modesty) that he was not the most important official in the government but (in jest) that he was certainly the biggest, had no qualms about defending Germany’s refugee policy.
In 2015, Germany took in over 1.1 million refugees fleeing the wars in Syria and Iraq. So many other EU countries have literally closed their borders, with some leaders, notably Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, saying that this crisis is Germany’s problem because Merkel had unilaterally welcomed them in the first place. Across most of Europe, renationalization of what should be European policies is on the march.
When asked about Germany’s refugee policy and the Chancellery’s recent efforts to improve the living conditions of the millions of refugees in Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey, Altmaier was more than forthright.
“We have admitted the refugees for reasons of our European humanitarian values,” he told the banqueting hall that was almost half empty, despite the enormity of the crisis that is doing untold damage to European solidarity.
“And we admitted them because we are wholeheartedly convinced that the stability of the entire region, not just of Europe but the Middle East, largely depends on whether we handle this challenge with care, or there will be devastating results,” he added. The refugee crisis is a geostrategic crisis.
Germany is leaning on Turkey to try to stop smugglers from transporting refugees across the Aegean Sea to Greece. And Turkey, which has already spent $10 billion on providing food, shelter, and medical care to over 2.5 million refugees, is now under increasing pressure to open its borders to the many more thousands fleeing the Russian bombardment of Aleppo.
Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, Turkey’s foreign minister, defended his country’s policy. “We have not closed the border,” he said. “But we also have security concerns,” he added. He insisted that Turkey is making it easier for refugees to work in the country.
But the more Çavuşoğlu spoke, the more he gave the impression that Germany—because the rest of the EU is not going to help the refugees—is outsourcing the problem, which would suit Berlin and other EU capitals. Indeed, NATO is now prepared to send patrol ships that will send back refugees attempting to cross the Aegean Sea to Turkey.
At the same time, there is a belated drive by the Europeans to increase their contributions to the UN refugee agency and the UN World Food Program—having miserably failed to respond to repeated requests by both UN agencies to finance housing, education, food, and health for refugees in the camps in Lebanon and Jordan.
“Yes, we are much too late,” said Bert Koenders, the Dutch foreign minister. “We have seen a complete lack of interest on the protection of civilians and the functioning of the United Nations Security Council to stop the fighting,” he added.
Somehow, Koenders’s approach to this unending crisis was so technical that it lacked a sense of how it is damaging the EU. His Italian counterpart, Paolo Gentiloni, conveniently ducked the question about Russia’s role in Syria. It was left up to William Lacy Swing, director general of the International Organization for Migration, to remind the panelists of their moral and humanitarian obligations.
That is not going to help Altmaier or his boss. Germany is doing what it can to provide safety for those who genuinely need it. Altmaier, as much as Merkel, knows that the refugee crisis will end once the war in Syria ends. On that note, Altmaier sounded far from optimistic about the latest attempts to agree a ceasefire among all the parties in Syria. “I believe it when I see it,” he said.
Let’s see how Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev will justify his country’s policies in Syria on day two of the Munich Security Conference and how he will use the occasion to tell his Russian sympathizers here that it’s time to turn over a new leaf.
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Dempsey is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie Europe
- Europe Needs to Hear What America is SayingCommentary
- Babiš’s Victory in Czechia Is Not a Turning Point for European PopulistsCommentary
Judy Dempsey
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Strategic Europe
- Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?Commentary
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not LessCommentary
Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.
Dimitar Bechev
- Europe on Iran: Gone with the WindCommentary
Europe’s reaction to the war in Iran has been disunited and meek, a far cry from its previously leading role in diplomacy with Tehran. To avoid being condemned to the sidelines while escalation continues, Brussels needs to stand up for international law.
Pierre Vimont
- Taking the Pulse: Can European Defense Survive the Death of FCAS?Commentary
France and Germany’s failure to agree on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) raises questions about European defense. Amid industrial rivalries and competing strategic cultures, what does the future of European military industrial projects look like?
Rym Momtaz, ed.