• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Martha Brill Olcott"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

In The Media

Rescue Effort Botched in Russian Hostage Crisis

Link Copied
By Martha Brill Olcott
Published on Oct 31, 2002
Program mobile hero image

Program

Russia and Eurasia

The Russia and Eurasia Program continues Carnegie’s long tradition of independent research on major political, societal, and security trends in and U.S. policy toward a region that has been upended by Russia’s war against Ukraine.  Leaders regularly turn to our work for clear-eyed, relevant analyses on the region to inform their policy decisions.

Learn More

Source: Carnegie

CBC Radio's Commentary

By Martha Olcott

31/10/02

Transcript:


Introduction:

President Putin appears to be winning strong support for his handling of the Russian hostage crisis. That despite scores of people dead. Martha Olcott specializes in Russian affairs at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. On Commentary she says the Russians actually dropped the ball and that could have repercussions for the West.

Martha Olcott:

The Russian government obviously faced some terrible choices in how to resolve the hostage crisis. But the ineptness of their response - 115 hostages dead as well as scores of hostage takers - leaves a bitter taste.

Making decisions in hostage-taking situations is complex and best left to professionals. But one doesn't have to be a specialist on terrorism to criticize the lack of preparation with which the Russian government chose to intervene.

The authorities in Moscow should have planned and executed the release of the hostages with far more attention to detail. The dosage of poison gas used should have been considered more carefully. Doctors and other medical personnel should have been mobilized and brought to the site to follow right behind the special forces who lobbed in the gas, after a brief but safe interval. Ambulances should have been brought in close to the building (in place of the city buses that had been parked there from the early hours of the crisis). These ambulances should have been staffed with medical personnel well briefed on what side-effects to expect and equipped with the proper antidotes to administer in order to counteract the potentially poisonous properties of the gas that filled the theater. But none of this was done, creating a still mounting number of fatalities and the risk that hundreds of the surviving hostages could have serious lingering health problems.

The missteps broadcast live on Russian television, seem certain to come back to haunt Russian president Vladimir Putin. His first term as president is now roughly half over, and has been filled with successive images of Russian failure. There have been a series of civil and military disasters, including the sinking of the Kursk submarine by a Russian torpedo. That too was another botched rescue that left no survivors.

Most serious is the seemingly unending war in Chechnya. Putin sent Russian troops back to Chechnya promising the Russian people the victory that had eluded his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin. Actions like the Chechen's taking theater-goers hostage may harden feelings among ordinary Russians as to the justness of this war. But the Russian government's handling of the crisis will do little to assure them that either victory or a negotiated settlement is within reach.

Faced with a sense of growing desperation, Putin might decide to widen this war, attacking so-called "terrorist" targets in nearby republics of the Russian federation, or even in neighboring Georgia. The latter would be bad news for the Bush administration. It would have to strongly condemn Russian actions, at the very time that the US is seeking a broad international coalition for possible military action in Iraq.

For Commentary, I'm Martha Olcott in Washington.

Commentary is a national program on Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) Radio. It runs on all of Canadian stations between 08:15 and 08:30 weekday mornings.

About the Author

Martha Brill Olcott

Former Senior Associate, Russia and Eurasia Program and, Co-director, al-Farabi Carnegie Program on Central Asia

Olcott is professor emerita at Colgate University, having taught political science there from 1974 to 2002. Prior to her work at the endowment, Olcott served as a special consultant to former secretary of state Lawrence Eagleburger.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    After Crimea: Will Kazakhstan be Next in Putin’s Reintegration Project?

      Martha Brill Olcott

  • Article
    China’s Unmatched Influence in Central Asia

      Martha Brill Olcott

Martha Brill Olcott
Former Senior Associate, Russia and Eurasia Program and, Co-director, al-Farabi Carnegie Program on Central Asia
Martha Brill Olcott
SecurityCaucasusRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Trump and Netanyahu speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier

    The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

  • Seoul traffic at night
    Commentary
    Emissary
    How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive Agenda

    The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares

  • Paper
    A Tight Spot: Challenges Facing the Russian Oil Sector Through 2035

    Russian oil production is remarkably resilient to significant price changes, but significant political headwinds may lead to a drop regardless of economics.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Did Messaging App Telegram Fall From Grace in Russia?

    The history of Telegram’s relations with the Russian state offers a salutary lesson for international platforms that believe they can reach a compromise with the Kremlin.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Russia’s Imperial Retreat Is Europe’s Strategic Opportunity

    The war in Ukraine is costing Russia its leverage overseas. Across the South Caucasus and Middle East, this presents an opportunity for Europe to pick up the pieces and claim its own sphere of influence.

      William Dixon, Maksym Beznosiuk

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.