Article
Dr. Albert Keidel
{
"authors": [
"Albert Keidel"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Japan"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Exchange-Rate Regimes and Capital Flows in East Asia
In most emerging-market economies in East Asia, domestic economic, political, and social pressures push governments in the direction of a relatively inflexible exchange rate and freer capital inflows. This is a bad combination. Exchange rate stability and predictability would be a boon to commerce and finance. But achieving it is easier said than done.
Published on Jun 13, 2004
In most emerging-market economies in East Asia, it seems that domestic economic, political, and social pressures push governments in the direction of a relatively inflexible exchange rate and freer short-term capital inflows. This is a bad combination. It potentially leads to a long cycle of exchange-rate and capital-account difficulties, crisis, and consolidation. Even though a country may be at the benign phase in this cycle, underlying conditions are unlikely to have changed, and the difficulty, disorderly, phases of the cycle are likely to return.
The general combination of inflexible exchange rates and freer capital flows leaves emerging market economies exposed to large transactions with maturity and currency mismatches. A better domestic regulatory system might help, but these are difficult to achieve in an emerging market economy. Regulating capital inflows may be seen as a substitute for better domestic regulation, and a number of background conditions, like large FDI flows and global markets that make it easier for emerging markets to run surpluses, could make it easier for governments to navigate their difficult policy course.
In general, however, each emerging market has to look at its own circumstances to find ways to reduce the risks from exchange rate inflexibility with freer capital flows. Market-based flexibility backed up by adequate hedging activities may be the ideal tool, and when this is not possible because of opposition by domestic interest groups, the choices are much more difficult.
What is more, the significant gap between China's circumstances and Japan's means that any harmonization of currencies in the region, to achieve better exchange-rate predictability, is many decades away.
Exchange-rate predictability for any given transaction is one important objective. To my mind, the overarching goal of economic policy, including exchange-rate regime determination, is orderly and sustained economic growth and poverty reduction. To this end, exchange rate stability and predictability would obviously be a boon to commerce and finance. Achieving it, however - even imperfectly - generally requires consideration and management of the impact of capital flows as well as domestic and international pressures.
For the full text of the paper, click on the link to the right.
About the Author
Dr. Albert Keidel
Former Senior Associate, China Program
Keidel served as acting director and deputy director for the Office of East Asian Nations at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Before joining Treasury in 2001, he covered economic trends, system reforms, poverty, and country risk as a senior economist in the World Bank office in Beijing.
- As China's Exports Drop, Can Domestic Demand Drive Growth?
- China’s Fourth Quarter 2008 Statistical RecordArticle
Dr. Albert Keidel
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Iran War’s Global ReachCollection
As the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran continues, Carnegie scholars contribute cutting-edge analysis on the events of the war and their wide-reaching implications. From the impact on Iran and its immediate neighbors to the responses from Gulf states to fuel and fertilizer shortages caused by the effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, the war is reshaping Middle East alliances and creating shockwaves around the world. Carnegie experts analyze it all.
- “It’s Not Like Turning a Switch On and Off”Commentary
Why the Iran ceasefire isn’t a quick fix to the Strait of Hormuz energy crisis.
Helima Croft, Aaron David Miller
- China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of EverythingCommentary
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
- Southeast Asia’s Agency Amid the New Oil CrisisCommentary
There is no better time for the countries of Southeast Asia to reconsider their energy security than during this latest crisis.
Gita Wirjawan
- Fuel Crisis Forces Politically Perilous Trade-Offs in IndonesiaCommentary
As conflict in the Middle East drives up fuel costs across Asia, Indonesia faces difficult policy trade-offs over subsidies, inflation, and fiscal credibility. President Prabowo’s personalized governance style may make these hard choices even harder to navigate.
Sana Jaffrey
