Latin America's Progress on Gender Equality

{
  "authors": [
    "Eduardo Zepeda"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

In The Media

Latin America's Progress on Gender Equality

Policymakers aiming to reduce gender inequality in Latin America need to look beyond national averages in order to uncover the real conditions women face in the labor market.

By Eduardo Zepeda

Published on Feb 29, 2008

Source: International Poverty Centre

Though Latin America has shown notable progress in achieving gender equality, poor women in the region still face limited opportunities for decent work. In a new analysis published by the International Poverty Centre, Carnegie Senior Associate Eduardo Zepeda unravels the complexity of women’s labor force participation in Latin America: many poor women can only find work performing domestic chores for rich or middle-class households, which in turn enables wealthier women to secure higher wage employment outside the household.

Click on the link above for the full text of the article.

For more International Poverty Centre publications, click here.

About the Author

Eduardo Zepeda

Former Senior Associate, Trade, Equity and Development Program

Zepeda is inter-regional policy coordinator of the Development Policy and Analysis Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs at the United Nations General Secretariat. He was previously a senior associate in the Trade, Equity, and Development Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Recent Work

Report
Employing India: Guaranteeing Jobs for the Rural Poor
- +2
  Eduardo Zepeda, Scott McDonald, Manoj Panda, …
Other
Rethinking Trade Policy for Development: Lessons From Mexico Under NAFTA
- Eduardo Zepeda, Timothy A. Wise, Kevin P. Gallagher

Economy Trade North America South America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
BIS in the New Age of Import Controls
The Bureau of Industry and Security needs to adjust its focus and practices to maintain its position as the U.S. government’s primary champion of international technological competition.
Geoffrey Irving
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Kremlin Can No Longer Postpone Hard Economic Decisions
Depleted financial reserves and a shrinking tax base mean it is no longer possible to simultaneously deliver high defense spending, price stability, and economic growth.
Alexandra Prokopenko
Commentary
Emissary
The Fallout of the U.S.–Canada Trade War Won’t Be Limited to North America
U.S. trading partners in Asia are closely watching the dispute for signs of how it may affect their own interests.
Barbara Weisel
Paper
How the U.S. Export-Import Bank Can Finally Join the Fight Against Climate Change
Congress needs to step up and make EXIM a low-carbon financing powerhouse.
Jesse Young
Commentary
Emissary
The Two Key Takeaways From Xi’s Egypt Visit
Amid celebrations of bilateral ties was a deeper focus on stability in the Middle East.
Amr Hamzawy

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

hands holding semiconductors in production

Commentary

BIS in the New Age of Import Controls

The Bureau of Industry and Security needs to adjust its focus and practices to maintain its position as the U.S. government’s primary champion of international technological competition.

Geoffrey Irving

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Kremlin Can No Longer Postpone Hard Economic Decisions

Depleted financial reserves and a shrinking tax base mean it is no longer possible to simultaneously deliver high defense spending, price stability, and economic growth.