The Dilemma of the Yemeni Detainees at Guantanamo Bay

{
  "authors": [
    "Christopher Boucek"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Yemen"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

The Dilemma of the Yemeni Detainees at Guantanamo Bay

More than one-third of the remaining 255 detainees at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo Bay are Yemenis, representing the single largest national contingent.

By Christopher Boucek

Published on Nov 20, 2008

Source: CTC Sentinel

More than one-third of the remaining 255 detainees at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo Bay are Yemenis, representing the single largest national contingent. Since the detention facility opened in early 2002, Yemenis have consistently comprised a sizeable percentage of the population. Other countries, most notably Saudi Arabia, have successfully repatriated many of their nationals, but Yemen has been unable to convince the United States to release detainees into its custody. There is even widespread speculation in both the United States and Yemen that the Yemeni government does not actually want the detainees back and is content to let them remain in U.S. custody. The Yemeni government, however, maintains in private its stated, public goal to return the detainees to Yemen, charge those it has evidence against and release the rest. For the United States, this has been insufficient, and it has repeatedly sought assurances from the Yemeni government that it will set standardized restrictions before any individuals are released. Part of this hesitation stems from security concerns about what would happen to the detainees once they are returned to Yemen.

This article originally appeared in CTC Sentinel Combating Terrorism Center, West Point

About the Author

Christopher Boucek

Former Associate, Middle East Program

Boucek was an associate in the Carnegie Middle East Program where his research focused on security challenges in the Arabian Peninsula and Northern Africa.

Recent Work

Q&A
Yemen After Saleh’s Return and Awlaki’s Exit
- Christopher Boucek
Q&A
Rivals—Iran vs. Saudi Arabia
- Christopher Boucek, Karim Sadjadpour

Security Military Foreign Policy North America United States Yemen

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Strategic Europe
Europe Needs its own Sanctions-Enforcement Muscle
The EU can impose sanctions but struggles to enforce them without the United States. With Washington increasingly disinterested in backing European interests, the bloc must now fend for itself.
Nicu Popescu, Tiago Antunes
Article
Africa in Demand: How the Continent Is Advancing Its Interests in a Competitive World
Global and rising powers will need to engage with Africa’s priorities and agency in order to secure the continent’s increasingly attractive partnerships.
Fonteh Akum
Commentary
Emissary
Central Asia Wants U.S. Investments. It Is Less Sure About U.S. Conditions.
Rubio’s recent visit brought welcome attention, but more capital requires governance changes that may be a hard sell for regional governments.
Jennifer B. Murtazashvili
Paper
The End of Primacy Without Pain: Why the Domestic Foundation of American Power Is Crumbling
America’s foreign-policy objectives have grown more demanding while Americans have demanded greater focus on their own affairs.
Stephen Wertheim
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Why Has Tokyo’s Response to Kremlin Challenges Been So Muted?
Japan’s long-term security policy is driven by concerns about China, and there is little appetite for (or interest in) pursuing a confrontation with Moscow.
James D.J. Brown

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Strategic Europe

Europe Needs its own Sanctions-Enforcement Muscle

The EU can impose sanctions but struggles to enforce them without the United States. With Washington increasingly disinterested in backing European interests, the bloc must now fend for itself.

Nicu Popescu, Tiago Antunes

African finance ministers sit in front of a blue IMF-WB screen.

Article

Africa in Demand: How the Continent Is Advancing Its Interests in a Competitive World

Global and rising powers will need to engage with Africa’s priorities and agency in order to secure the continent’s increasingly attractive partnerships.

Fonteh Akum

Commentary

Emissary

Central Asia Wants U.S. Investments. It Is Less Sure About U.S. Conditions.

Rubio’s recent visit brought welcome attention, but more capital requires governance changes that may be a hard sell for regional governments.

Jennifer B. Murtazashvili

Military rescue helicopter during sunset stock photo

Paper

The End of Primacy Without Pain: Why the Domestic Foundation of American Power Is Crumbling

America’s foreign-policy objectives have grown more demanding while Americans have demanded greater focus on their own affairs.

Stephen Wertheim

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Why Has Tokyo’s Response to Kremlin Challenges Been So Muted?

Japan’s long-term security policy is driven by concerns about China, and there is little appetite for (or interest in) pursuing a confrontation with Moscow.

James D.J. Brown