• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "David Rothkopf"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

What's Next for Capitalism?

The genius of all great systems is their ability to reinvent themselves, to adapt to changing environments. That's the reason why those whose response to the current crisis is to announce the end of capitalism are so misguided. Capitalism will survive. But it will not, and should not, survive unchanged. We are going to enter an era of resurgent regulation at the national level and global level.

Link Copied
By David Rothkopf
Published on Nov 21, 2008

Source: PBS's NOW

The genius of all great systems is their ability to reinvent themselves, to adapt and adjust to changing environments. This ability not just to evolve is one of the central characteristics of capitalism. Even in its darkest moments—perhaps especially in its darkest moments—it tears down that which does not work and creates incentives for people and companies to find new solutions, ideas, alliances, technologies that will work better. That's the reason why those whose response to the current crisis is to announce the end of capitalism are so misguided. Capitalism will survive. But it will not, and should not, survive unchanged.

We went too far toward what the French called "hyper-capitalism" of creating markets that lack the kind of regulatory mechanisms and social shock-absorbers that virtually all markets have had since the dawn of time. The idea of the completely free market is an abstraction and a practical impossibility. Since the earliest days of capitalism the rights of market actors have been constrained to protect the public good whether it was by laws enjoining dangerous behaviors or by requiring the a portion of profits go to the state to provide essential services. In our recent past we not only ideologically tried to push back too far against those mechanisms that protect the public interest with regard to markets but a number of revolutions made those mechanisms that did exist far less effective.

Globalization put many corporate activities beyond the reach of national governments. New financial instruments grew so complicated even sophisticated regulators couldn't understand them. New technologies added speed and volatility to degrees that made it impossible for regulators to keep up. And that's only the story in financial markets. In other global markets the challenges have been similarly great.

Now, in order to compensate for these failures, we are going to enter an era in which regulation is resurgent both at the national level and at the global level. New institutions will have to be created to ensure that global markets serve the greater good and disruptions within those markets do not produce unacceptable collateral damage to society. This is hardly the end of capitalism. Rather it is simply the beginning of 21st Century global capitalism. It may be different from that to which we have been accustomed for some time, but it will also be perhaps the single most important force defining the global era because it will link nations and define necessary changes with a speed and force beyond the capabilities of any other global system (including government). That can be a good thing, often will be, but we need to remember that capitalism is an amoral system and that a society without a moral basis is unsustainable. That must come, at least in part, from government. In the century ahead, it must come in part from international as well as traditional national mechanisms. Finding the balance between these new and historic forces will be one of the great challenges of the decades ahead.

About the Author

David Rothkopf

Former Visiting Scholar

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    How Bush, Obama, and Trump Ended Pax Americana

      David Rothkopf

  • In The Media
    A Bigger Clubhouse

      David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf
Former Visiting Scholar
David Rothkopf
EconomyTradeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle East

    The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Trump with arms out, surrounded by mics
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran

    Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.

      Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller

  • Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy
    Report
    Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy

    At the heart of Biden’s approach to China was the consolidation of a framework for strategic competition with an eye toward coexistence.

      • Senkai Hsia

      Christopher S. Chivvis, Senkai Hsia

  • Article
    What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?

    India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Trump and Netanyahu speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier

    The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.