• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Trade Liberalization Provides Modest Benefits for Brazil

A Doha trade agreement or a major trade pact with other developing countries, including China, would provide a small boost to Brazil’s economy.

Link Copied
Published on Apr 10, 2009

WASHINGTON, Apr 9—A Doha trade agreement or a major trade pact with other developing countries, including China, would provide a small boost to Brazil’s economy, according to a new report from the Carnegie Endowment, the International Labour Office, and the UN Development Program.

After eight years of strong growth, Brazil has emerged as a key player in global trade negotiations and an advocate for a greater role for emerging powers in international economic policy making. At the same time, Brazilian policy makers face complex challenges as they try to grow their economy in ways that will increase employment and living standards. Carnegie’s Sandra Polaski and co-authors from the ILO and the UNDP examine the trade policy choices Brazil faces and their impact for household incomes, employment, and production at the national and regional levels.

Key points:

  • Potential gains from each of the trade scenarios are small—less than 0.5 percent improvement in real income.
  • Gains or losses from fluctuations in soy, wheat, and crude oil prices—like those seen in 2007 and 2008—have larger impacts on Brazil’s economy than the trade policy choices examined.
  • The trade scenarios would provide modest gains in employment of unskilled workers, a welcome finding, but could shift workers to agriculture, where wages are lower.
  • Despite concerns to the contrary, strong growth in India and China would slightly increase employment in Brazil.
  • Policy makers should consider additional social safety net measures to help households adapt to the structural changes induced by Brazil’s engagement with the global economy.

The authors conclude:

“As Brazil continues to integrate more deeply into the changing world economy, it is instructive to compare the relative impact of its trade policy choices, as well as the effects of the shocks it may experience as a result of greater integration…. As policy is debated, it is important that the pattern of gains and losses and the resulting adjustment costs be taken fully into account.”

###


AUTHORS

  • Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho is a professor in the Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” of the Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
  • Janine Berg is an employment specialist with the International Labour Office, Brasília.
  • Scott McDonald is a professor in the Department of Economics and Strategy, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
  • Sandra Polaski is a senior associate and director of the Trade, Equity, and Development Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.
  • Karen Thierfelder is a professor in the Economics Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.
  • Dirk Willenbockel is a research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton.
  • Eduardo Zepeda is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C., and a senior policy adviser in the Bureau for Development Policy of the United Nations Development Program, New York.

NOTES

  • Direct link to the PDF: www.carnegieendowment.org/files/brazil_global_economy.pdf
  • Direct link to the Portuguese PDF: www.carnegieendowment.org/files/O_Brasil_na_economia_mundial.pdf
  • This study uses computable general equilibrium models to examine the impact of different trade policy choices, including a multilateral agreement in the Doha Round of negotiations at the World Trade Organization and a series of free trade agreements with other developing countries, including India, China, and South Africa.
  • The study also probes the effect of world price volatility for commodities that are important to Brazil and the effects of rapid growth in China and India.
  • The study includes detailed regional information that allows an assessment of the effects on different regions and the potential for cross-regional migration.
  • Unlike most traditional models, the study does not assume full employment, instead reflecting Brazil’s actual unemployment levels.
  • Press Contact: Trent Perrotto, 202/939-2372, tperrotto@ceip.org
     


 

EconomyTradeNorth AmericaSouth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come Together

    The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • One man tossing a sack to another to stack on a truck
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Other Global Crisis Stemming From the Strait of Hormuz’s Blockage

    Even if the Iran war stops, restarting production and transport for fertilizers and their components could take weeks—at a crucial moment for planting.

      • Noah  Gordon ​​​​

      Noah Gordon, Lucy Corthell

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus Realignment

    With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less

    Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.

      Dimitar Bechev

  • Satellite of a damaged oil refinery
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Iran Is Pushing Its Neighbors Toward the United States

    Tehran’s attacks are reshaping the security situation in the Middle East—and forcing the region’s clock to tick backward once again.

      Amr Hamzawy

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.