In key sectors such as critical minerals, specialty agriculture, and fintech, Africa can become a global powerhouse by investing more in manufacturing, value-add, and scaling.
Kholofelo Kugler, Georgia Schaefer-Brown
{
"authors": [],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": []
}Source: Getty
A backgrounder on Kifaya.
This resource was published on 09/22/2010 and is not updated to reflect changing circumstances.
The Egyptian Movement for Change, best known by its slogan “Kifaya” (Enough), played an important role pushing for political reform in Egypt since its founding in 2004 and during the 2005 elections. Its influence decreased significantly thereafter. By the time of the uprising in 2011, the movement had already become obsolete. Although it joined in the protests, it never became an important protagonist. One of the movement’s founders, Abu al-‘Ila Madi, has stated that with the new political realities in Egypt, the movement’s role in the political sphere has ended and the group will not transform itself into a political party.
Kifaya was founded in November 2004 by 300 Egyptian intellectuals from various ideological backgrounds at a meeting in the home of al-Wasat party leader Abu al-‘Ila Madi. The meeting, called to discuss political opportunities in light of the upcoming 2005 parliamentary elections, set up a small committee of seven members, and a conference soon thereafter attended by more than 500 people concluded with the creation of the Kifaya movement. Rather than a political party, Kifaya was a coalition of political forces united only by a shared call for an end to President Hosni Mubarak’s rule.
Using simple but potent slogans, Kifaya called for political reforms and criticized the extension of Mubarak’s presidential term, the possible succession of Gamal Mubarak, government corruption, and Egypt’s emergency law in place since 1981. The movement organized unauthorized demonstrations, directly criticizing Mubarak and other members of the ruling elite. Following an initial protest by approximately 300 political activists outside the High Court in downtown Cairo in December 2004, Kifaya organized protests in many locations, including the Cairo Book Fair, university campuses, and downtown in Tahrir Square. By April 2005 protest spread outside Cairo, with anti-regime demonstrations held simultaneously in fourteen cities.
Kifaya received attention from the international media as a force for change, yet its achievements were few in the Mubarak era. The number of participants tended to be low, although demonstrations were held constantly. The Mubarak regime resorted to violent measures to contain Kifaya, including physical assault, arrests, and detainment without charges or trials, torture, and even sexual harassment and rape of female demonstrators. The regime also utilized the state-controlled media to discredit Kifaya. Another key obstacle to Kifaya’s success was its inability to forge a broad, cross-ideological coalition; the withdrawal of Islamist actors from the coalition significantly weakened its momentum. Finally, Kifaya was viewed as an elitist movement and failed to penetrate grassroots Egyptian society, operating instead in circles of intellectuals and political activists. By 2006, the organization had lost much of its drive.
Although Kifaya did not achieve any of the sweeping political reforms envisioned in its platform, it did establish a new and important precedent by challenging the incumbent regime directly.and by encouraging the formation of other groups, including the March 9 movement for university independence, Workers for Change, Youth for Change, Doctors for Change, Writers and Artists for Change, the Egyptian judges movement. It also was the first political initiative in Egypt to truly explore and capitalize on new social media and digital technology as its main means of communication and mobilization.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
In key sectors such as critical minerals, specialty agriculture, and fintech, Africa can become a global powerhouse by investing more in manufacturing, value-add, and scaling.
Kholofelo Kugler, Georgia Schaefer-Brown
U.S. agreements must contend with national data protection laws to make durable foreign policy instruments.
Jane Munga, Rose Mosero
For climate-focused civil society in countries like Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia to be most effective, organizations should work together to develop networks that extend their reach beyond their local area and connect across borders to share best practices and amplify each other’s work.
Sarah Yerkes
The recent African Cup of Nations tournament in Morocco touched on issues that largely transcended the sport.
Issam Kayssi, Yasmine Zarhloule
As Moscow looks for opportunities to build inroads on the continent, governments in West and Southern Africa are identifying new ways to promote their goals—and facing new risks.
Nate Reynolds, ed., Frances Z. Brown, ed., Frederic Wehrey, ed., …