An Update on the Leadership Initiative for Transportation Solvency

{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Other

An Update on the Leadership Initiative for Transportation Solvency

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform's final report outlines recommendations for reining in the U.S. deficit by 2015, including suggestions for the nation's transportation program.

Published on Jan 12, 2011

Source: January 12

On December 1, 2010, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, co-chairs of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, released final recommendations for reining in the U.S. deficit by 2015. The report, The Moment of Truth, addressed all aspects of the budget, including the country’s transportation program. The proposal included input from the eighteen commission members but was based on the earlier Co-Chairs’ Proposal, released in November 2010.

All four recommendations submitted to the commission by the co-chairs of the Carnegie Endowment’s Leadership Initiative on Transportation Solvency were included in the commission’s final report. Below is a summary of how the recommendations for reforming and raising revenue for the U.S. transportation program—made by the Initiative’s co-chairs, the Honorable Bill Bradley, the Honorable Tom Ridge, and the Honorable David Walker—correspond to recommendations in The Moment of Truth.

Though eleven commission members endorsed the report—more than half of all members—they fell three votes short of the support needed to force a Congressional vote on the report. This proposal will remain salient, however, as the new Congress considers the growing budget, the debt ceiling, and the reauthorization of the transportation bill in 2011.

Leadership Initiative Recommendations November 2010	Fiscal Responsibility Commission Proposal December 2010
End Wasteful Spending on Existing Surface Transportation Accounts	“Before asking taxpayers to pay more for roads, rail, bridges, and infrastructure, we must ensure existing funds are not wasted. The Commission recommends significant reforms to control federal highway spending.”
Invest in Infrastructure to Grow the Economy	“Congress should limit trust fund spending to the most pressing infrastructure needs rather than forcing states to fund low-priority projects.”
Fully Fund a Reformed Federal Surface Transportation Program with New Revenue Sources	“RECOMMENDATION 1.7: FULLY FUND THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND INSTEAD OF RELYING ON DEFICIT SPENDING. Dedicate a 15-cent per gallon increase in the gas tax to transportation funding and limit spending if necessary to match the revenue the trust fund collects each year.”
Create a Transportation Realignment and Accountability Commission	“RECOMMENDATION 1.9: Establish a cut-and-invest committee to cut low-priority spending, increase high-priority investment, and consolidate duplicative federal programs.”

Climate Change North America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
What the New Democratic Congress Can (and Can’t) Do on Foreign Policy
Democrats now have the gavel and the purse, but the executive branch still pulls the levers on the U.S. role in the world.
+10
James M. Acton, Dan Baer, Mark Baldassare, …
Commentary
Emissary
COP31 and the Future of Climate Clubs
As the United States exits UN climate efforts, these smaller and less formal groupings will take on greater significance in global climate governance.
Theodore Zaritsky, Stewart Patrick
Paper
Bridging the Gap Between Climate Mobility Modeling and Policy Action
Climate mobility models and policymakers are constrained by rational challenges. Both sides need to be better understood in order to make progress.
+1
Kayly Ober, Otoniel Ramos, Lawrence Huang, …
Research
Planetary Power: Geoengineering and the New Geopolitics of Climate Intervention
Geoengineering is becoming a geopolitical question as much as a climate one. The way states and the private sector pursue these technologies, assess risks, and drive research increasingly appears focused on gaining a strategic edge. In a field where governance in lagging behind, Europe should keep track of the geopolitical implications if it is to develop effective regulatory frameworks.
Olivia Lazard, ed.
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?
Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.
Sergey Vakulenko

Leadership Initiative Recommendations
November 2010

Fiscal Responsibility Commission Proposal
December 2010

End Wasteful Spending on Existing Surface Transportation Accounts

“Before asking taxpayers to pay more for roads, rail, bridges, and infrastructure, we must ensure existing funds are not wasted. The Commission recommends significant reforms to control federal highway spending.”

Invest in Infrastructure to Grow the Economy

“Congress should limit trust fund spending to the most pressing infrastructure needs rather than forcing states to fund low-priority projects.”

Fully Fund a Reformed Federal Surface Transportation Program with New Revenue Sources

“RECOMMENDATION 1.7: FULLY FUND THE TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND INSTEAD OF RELYING ON DEFICIT SPENDING. Dedicate a 15-cent per gallon increase in the gas tax to transportation funding and limit spending if necessary to match the revenue the trust fund collects each year.”

Create a Transportation Realignment and Accountability Commission

“RECOMMENDATION 1.9: Establish a cut-and-invest committee to cut low-priority spending, increase high-priority investment, and consolidate duplicative federal programs.”

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Emissary

What the New Democratic Congress Can (and Can’t) Do on Foreign Policy

Democrats now have the gavel and the purse, but the executive branch still pulls the levers on the U.S. role in the world.

- +10
James M. Acton, Dan Baer, Mark Baldassare, …

Commentary

Emissary

COP31 and the Future of Climate Clubs

As the United States exits UN climate efforts, these smaller and less formal groupings will take on greater significance in global climate governance.

Theodore Zaritsky, Stewart Patrick

Paper

Bridging the Gap Between Climate Mobility Modeling and Policy Action

Climate mobility models and policymakers are constrained by rational challenges. Both sides need to be better understood in order to make progress.

- +1
Kayly Ober, Otoniel Ramos, Lawrence Huang, …

Research

Planetary Power: Geoengineering and the New Geopolitics of Climate Intervention

Geoengineering is becoming a geopolitical question as much as a climate one. The way states and the private sector pursue these technologies, assess risks, and drive research increasingly appears focused on gaining a strategic edge. In a field where governance in lagging behind, Europe should keep track of the geopolitical implications if it is to develop effective regulatory frameworks.

Olivia Lazard, ed.

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

How Will Trump and Putin’s Diesel Deal Impact Russia and Global Markets?

Without a ceasefire with Ukraine on attacking each other’s energy infrastructure—to which the Kremlin is unlikely to agree—the diesel agreement between Putin and Trump is largely for show, rather than representing a genuine increase in the volumes of Russian diesel on the global market.

Sergey Vakulenko