in the media

Libya: The Politics of Intervention

As the international community pursues a range of activities to help end the violence in Libya, analysts and politicians should avoid creating a false dichotomy between imposing a no-fly zone on the country and doing nothing to prevent the deaths of Libyan civilians.

published by
Diane Rehm Show
 on March 9, 2011

Source: Diane Rehm Show

As fighting in Libya enters its third week, there is increasing international pressure for the imposition of a no-fly-zone in Libya. Carnegie’s Jessica Mathews spoke on NPR’s Diane Rehm Show, arguing that the international community should not create a false dichotomy between taking a military action like imposing a no-fly-zone and doing nothing to help the Libyan rebels. There is a range of activities that the international community and the United States can take to build a multinational consensus and create a sense of pressure on Qaddafi and his regime. Such activities include sharing intelligence with the opposition members, airlifting in weapons, or creating safe zones to deliver humanitarian aid, among many other options.

Mathews pointed out that the United States should think carefully before stepping into an open-ended military commitment in Libya. The world is currently seeing the beginning of a gigantic historic moment, she said, and the United States may see significant changes in countries that have greater importance to U.S. national interest than Libya. Ultimately, it is crucial to consider the consequences of military intervention, Mathews argued. Such an intervention will have consequences that cannot be predicted and may raise expectations and set a precedent in the region that the United States will not be able to meet.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.