Ibrahim Saif, Ahmed Ghoneim
{
"authors": [
"Ibrahim Saif"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Levant"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}Source: Getty
Where are the Fruits of Jordan's Economic Growth?
Economic growth in Jordan has yet to benefit different regions and classes throughout the country. In order to create widespread change, Jordan should embark on a new economic policy that reflects its social and political reforms.
Source: Al Ghad

The answer is easy. In order for this growth to benefit different regions and classes, it must be evenly distributed to create job opportunities. But the actual growth achieved so far has not accomplished this.
Comparing the track of profits and wages is particularly revealing in looking at growth in Jordan. Corporate profits have made up a rising percentage of overall growth for the past five years, whereas the proportion of wages has declined from about 18 percent in 1990 to around 14 percent in 2009. Thus, Jordan’s growth has exacerbated the current economic gap by compounding the concentration of wealth.
Job creation has been mainly limited to the service and construction sectors, resulting in low wages and productivity. New jobs have not been distributed widely enough to meet the hopes that naturally arise from such growth. Productivity has also declined over the past few years.
Moreover, the quasi-monopolistic structure of the market grants significant power to those who control key sectors, while increasing profit margins and keeping the market under the control of these elites by making it difficult for newcomers to enter the market. There are no effective measures to dismantle these monopolies.
The unequal distribution of the benefits of growth is also tied to the tax system, which does not help redistribute income. Income tax represents a small percentage of state revenues and therefore does not foster social justice in terms of securing adequate resources to education and health. Indeed disparities between the center and periphery have been widening not only in terms of income, but also in terms of the services provided and quality of education. Serious thinking is needed to come up with a more just tax system, one that is subject to greater accountability.
Jordan's “good governance” indicators are not encouraging. The country scores low on indexes measuring the rule of law and the facilitation of investment and market access. Thus the country’s solution is rooted in the need for real reform to bolster the state's legislative and regulatory capabilities.
In its strengthened role, the state and its institutions will be able to encourage private investment through new incentives, focus on improving productivity, review the current tax system with an eye toward implementing a progressive tax system, and dismantle the existing monopolies.
There will be initial resistance to all of these measures, especially from those who benefit from the current system. But this would mark the beginning of a new economic policy that could create a different kind of growth, one that addresses the social and political changes sweeping Jordan and the region.
About the Author
Former Senior Associate, Middle East Center
Saif is an economist specializing in the political economy of the Middle East. His research focuses on international trade and structural adjustment programs in developing countries, with emphasis on Jordan and the Middle East.
- The Private Sector in Postrevolution EgyptPaper
- The Economic Agenda of the Islamist PartiesPaper
Ibrahim Saif, Muhammad Abu Rumman
Recent Work
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East AsiaArticle
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
- Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI CompetitionArticle
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
- Smuggling and Civil Peace on Lebanon’s Border: The Case of SummaqiyyehArticle
The Lebanese authorities’ clampdown on illicit cross-border activity threatens to leave inhabitants of the historically neglected village, and the wider Akkar region, in an economically precarious position.
Mohanad Hage Ali
- India’s Press Note 3 Gamble: Opening the FDI Door to ChinaArticle
On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.
Konark Bhandari