Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"China",
"Western Europe",
"Germany"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}Source: Getty
Rescue from China?
The idea that there is a role here for China or other foreign entities—to lend foolishly to countries to whom the ECB or Germany are too skeptical to do so—simply indicates how confused the whole euro project has become.
The second question is whether the peripheral countries need to be bailed out. The answer here depends on whether or not they are simply facing short-term financing gaps or whether they are truly incapable of servicing their obligations. If it is the former, then the European Central Bank (ECB) or Germany should step in and provide the funding. If foreigners do so, the euro must strengthen against the dollar and with it the European trade deficit will automatically widen and growth prospects in Europe decline. If it is the latter, then debts in the periphery should be restructured and partially forgiven. Otherwise, there is absolutely no way for peripheral Europe to grow its way back into health. The idea that there is a role here for China or other foreign entities—to lend foolishly to countries to whom the ECB or Germany are too skeptical to do so—simply indicates how confused the whole euro project has become.
About the Author
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Who Is Funding Russia’s War in the 2027 Budget?Commentary
For every ruble allocated to social policy, health, and education in 2027, double that amount is earmarked for the army, the police, and the security services.
Alexandra Prokopenko
- The U.S. Has Weapons in Space. Now What?Commentary
The acknowledgment has sparked fears of a new arms race with China and Russia.
Chris O’Meara
- Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Stare Down China on Trade?Commentary
The European Commissioner for Trade is headed to China. But after President Xi’s bridge-building visit to Washington, can a more isolated EU overcome Beijing’s stranglehold on critical raw materials? Who will blink first?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.Commentary
The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.
Jeffrey Prescott
- International Demand for Russia’s Arctic Shipping Route Is Unlikely to LastCommentary
Cargo traffic through Russia’s Northern Sea Route has increased because of the disruption caused by the conflict in the Middle East, the Ukraine war, and U.S.-China tensions.
Mikhail Korostikov