• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Lahcen Achy"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Maghreb"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Morocco and the Justice and Development Party’s Economic Program

The Justice and Development Party, which leads the government in Morocco, must invest the trust it currently enjoys wisely, working with the many groups that make up Moroccan society to set priorities.

Link Copied
By Lahcen Achy
Published on Dec 13, 2011

Source: Al-Hayat

Morocco’s Justice and Development Party (PJD) took the lead in November’s parliamentary elections, qualifying it to run the government for the next five years. The ambition and clarity of the party’s campaign promises can be credited with winning over broad swaths of the electorate. Now that the party has won the premiership, its success will depend on its ability to fulfill its promises. 

The party’s victory, aside from the regional context that has seen the rise of Islamic parties in Tunisia and Egypt, stems from three factors: 

First, the PJD has never been a part of any previous government, which made it an alternative to the other political parties, be they on the right, center, or left. 

Second, the party played a notable role in the opposition during the last parliamentary cycles. Its members in the parliament made outstanding contributions to the discussion of draft laws and the questioning of ministers.  

Third, the party campaigned on ambitious social and economic programs with specific goals, backed by quantifiable commitments to win the voters’ trust. 

The PJD has set as its target an economic growth rate of 7 percent a year, an exceptional level given Morocco’s economic growth history. Average growth was below 5 percent during the period between 2007 and 2011, despite extensive investment, both public and private. The party’s target also seems to be exaggerated when compared with the International Monetary Fund’s prediction that ranges from 4.5 to 5.5 percent. 

Two other factors make the 7 percent economic growth goal unrealistic. The first is the European Union’s (EU's) stalled economy. The EU is Morocco’s most important economic and financial partner, absorbing two-thirds of its exports and supplying 80 percent of its tourism revenue, in addition to 90 percent of all remittances, which are sent home by Moroccans living in the EU. The slow pace of economic growth within the European Union, which is not expected to surpass 2 percent over the next five years, could adversely affect European demand for Moroccan goods and services and hurt the country’s growth prospects.

And second, economic growth in Morocco remains closely tied to the agricultural sector, which provides 40 percent of jobs and no less than 15 percent of gross domestic product. This sector, however, has been characterized by severe fluctuations because of its dependence on climate conditions. 

The PJD has also promised to increase the monthly minimum wage by more than 25 percent—to the equivalent of $370. While rising wages may help improve private sector workers’ living conditions, this increase cannot be sustained without improving productivity,  especially since the minimum wage saw a 10 percent increase last year. Companies need to increase productivity to maintain their ability to compete in both domestic and foreign markets. To increase productivity, however, the qualifications of the labor force need upgrading, as two-thirds of Moroccan workers do not have any formal qualifications. 

As part of its program, the Justice and Development Party has also committed to keep the government’s budget deficit under 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)—the current figure is around 6 percent. This commitment is inconsistent with the ambitious goals the party has set to improve human development indicators. Any fiscal consolidation will require cutting universal food and fuel subsidies at a high political cost, especially in the short term. The political cost may be higher if the party cuts the tax rate on corporate profits from 30 to 25 percent as announced.

Sound economics suggests that the PJD’s ambitious goals require more government spending in the fields of education, health, and combating poverty and social exclusion. It is unclear how the party intends to do this while simultaneously cutting taxes and capping the deficit within 3 percent of GDP. 

While attempting to satisfy a broad spectrum of voters, the PJD has lost the consistency necessary to create a realistic and implementable government program. 

The party’s program emphasizes the key role of effective governance, as well as establishing rules of competition and transparency in order to improve both growth and social indicators. Improving governance, reforming the bureaucracy, fighting corruption, and enforcing market competition, however, require deep political and institutional reforms that may take years to materialize.

The new leadership cannot govern on rhetoric alone. The Justice and Development Party must invest the trust it currently enjoys wisely and honestly, working with the many groups that make up Moroccan society to set priorities and determine what is possible and achievable. It must then make bold, realistic choices that will probably not satisfy everyone but are in the interest of the country and its long-term stability. Most importantly, the party should avoid raising hopes and expectations unreasonably, leading to frustration and disappointment.

About the Author

Lahcen Achy

Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Middle East Center

Achy is an economist with expertise in development, institutional economics, trade, and labor and a focus on the Middle East and North Africa.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Arab States Need Industrial Policy Reform

      Lahcen Achy

  • Paper
    The Price of Stability in Algeria

      Lahcen Achy

Lahcen Achy
Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Middle East Center
Lahcen Achy
EconomyMaghreb

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • two men sitting next to each other
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Senegal’s Debt Crisis Has Moved Its Leaders from Partners to Rivals

    The impacts of the Faye-Sonko rupture could go well beyond the country’s borders.

      • Dr. Lesley Anne Warner

      Lesley Anne Warner

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

    A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.  

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?

    The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.  

      Salavat Abylkalikov

  • Chinese President Xi Jinping interacts with U.S. President Donald Trump during a state banquet at the Great Hall of the People on May 14, 2026 in Beijing, China.
    Commentary
    Post U.S.-China Summit: Managed Instability

    The U.S.-China Summit produced a welcome commitment to build a constructive, strategically stable relationship. However, the United States has a full agenda, including the USMCA review beginning this week, that will likely target Chinese practices of concern. If China views these efforts as inconsistent with the agreements reached in Beijing, it may slow or halt progress in response. 

      • Barbara Weisel

      Barbara Weisel

  • Commentary
    Can Europe Compete with the United States and China?

    Between the United States’ market-driven approach and China's state-led industrial strategy, Europe is reckoning with how it can remain competitive in the global economy. But is Europe in danger of becoming a U.S. or China colony?

      Noah Barkin, Anu Bradford

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.