• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Uri Dadush",
    "Kati Suominen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "China",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Is There Life for the G20 Beyond the Global Financial Crisis?

In 2008, the G20 proved to be an effective forum for coordinating action to stem the global financial crisis. But now that the storm has passed, it remains to be seen if the G20 is capable of assuming leadership on key economic governance issues.

Link Copied
By Uri Dadush and Kati Suominen
Published on Jan 31, 2012

Source: Journal of Globalization and Development

The G20 summit of heads of state, a creature born of the financial crisis, has appointed itself as the preeminent forum for global economic policymaking. Notwithstanding its original design to curb food price volatility, reform the global monetary system, and improve the working of the G20 itself, the group’s latest summit in Cannes, France in November 2011 was hijacked by the prolonged Eurozone financial crisis. An enormous source of turbulence in the world economy, Europe’s problems are the world’s problems and should be on the G20 agenda. But the Euro crisis also diverted the G20’s focus from its long-term imperative: ensuring sustained global economic growth. Instead, the outcome of the summit was inconclusive, vague, and thus modest: the group agreed in principle to increase the resources of the International Monetary Fund to respond to Europe’s woes; China modestly strengthened its pledge to move towards exchange flexibility to assuage critics of its currency manipulation; and the leaders yet again expressed their commitment to the Doha trade round.

The French summit epitomizes the difficulties in making sweeping yet specific decisions in a large, diverse group of nations with divergent interests. Comprising ten emerging markets, nine advanced economies, and the EU, the G20 reflects the reality of a world economy where developing and advanced countries are starting to have roughly equal economic weight. By including the largest emerging markets, it has the potential to fill a large gap in global economic governance that its predecessors – the G4 launched by US Treasury Secretary George Schultz in 1973, and the subsequent permutations, G5, G7 club of rich countries, and the G8, which also included Russia – were not built to bridge. The G7 helped the liberal democracies prevail in the Cold War and worked to enhance global macroeconomic stability, while the G8 sought to engage Russia after the collapse of the Soviet bloc. But with the onslaught of economic globalization and the rise of emerging economies, both groups are outdated as venues for global policy coordination. The G20, on the other hand, looks and feels like a 21st century forum.

About the Authors

Uri Dadush

Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program

Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.

Kati Suominen

German Marshall Fund

Authors

Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Uri Dadush
Kati Suominen
German Marshall Fund
EconomyTradeUnited StatesChinaNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Lee and Lula walking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Why Korea’s President Skipped Washington for Silicon Valley and Brasília

    Lee’s tour shows how Seoul is reorganizing its diplomacy away from Pyongyang and toward industrial networks and the geography of the compute economy.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares

  • An AS3 interceptor part of the Merops, an AI-powered anti-drone system is pictured during a NATO live-fire demonstration of a counter-UAS system on November 18, 2025 in Nowa Deba, Poland.
    Paper
    Confronting the Barriers to AI Diffusion in the U.S. Military

    The Pentagon is calling for a rapid AI transformation. Autonomous drones offer a case study in the eight bottlenecks the U.S. military must navigate to realize that vision.

      Jake Steckler

  • People standing on rocks in the ocean near the shore, with soldiers in the foreground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Migration Wave That Embarrassed Morocco and Rattled Europe

    Most migrants may have left Ceuta, but the effects may linger.

      • Alejandro Rodriguez
      • Sarah Yerkes

      Alejandro Martin Rodriguez, Sarah Yerkes

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Exporting Its Fuel Crisis to Central Asia

    When faced with fuel shortages in the past, Central Asian governments could always count on additional supplies from Moscow. That safety net no longer exists.

      Galiya Ibragimova

  • Shadowed figure lighting grocery store shelves
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Five Years After His Power Grab, Tunisia’s President Has Only Achieved Failure

    Saied’s main accomplishment has been to destroy a decade’s worth of democratic progress.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.