• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Paul Salem"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Arab Awakening"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "Levant",
    "Syria",
    "Middle East",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

Russia Should Move to Save Syria

Russia has the opportunity to move beyond saving the doomed Syrian regime to save the country itself from civil war and devastation and to bring about a political transition that leads to a stable and democratic Syria.

Link Copied
By Paul Salem
Published on Feb 29, 2012
Program mobile hero image

Program

Russia and Eurasia

The Russia and Eurasia Program continues Carnegie’s long tradition of independent research on major political, societal, and security trends in and U.S. policy toward a region that has been upended by Russia’s war against Ukraine.  Leaders regularly turn to our work for clear-eyed, relevant analyses on the region to inform their policy decisions.

Learn More
Project hero Image

Project

Eurasia in Transition

Learn More

Source: Vedomosti

Moscow holds key cards in the complex Syrian crisis. Russia should move beyond saving the doomed regime to save the country itself from civil war and devastation. It can use its influence to bring about a political transition that leads to a stable and democratic Syria. And in so doing Russia will maintain its good relations with Syria and boost its standing and influence in the Middle East.

The Syrian regime is losing the confrontation with its people. It cannot win. Its authoritarian structure is from a bygone era and is falling as other authoritarian regimes have in the region. And its minoritarian backbone is succumbing to the inevitable demographic logic of empowered communities and populations.

With its massive security apparatus and firepower in addition to continued support from Iran and other outside players, the regime can stagger on for a while in the face of a stubborn uprising in which thousands have perished. But Assad and his clique can only prolong the conflict and drive Syria deeper into civil war; meanwhile, the regime is losing ground every week. There is an urgent need for diplomacy that might save Syria from collapsing into chaos.

The Syrian people and opposition are not hostile to Russia or other outside players. They are simply demanding basic human and political rights. The regime has been unable or unwilling to accept the democratic transformation that has erupted in the Arab world in general and in Syria in particular. By turning a blind eye to reality, and falsely assuming that all political problems can be dealt with by force, it has put itself, the Alawi community, and Syria as a whole on a road to ruin.

The recent announcement to hold a referendum in the midst of ongoing massacres and without any prior negotiation with the opposition or consultation with the population only adds insult to injury. Moscow can save the regime from its own miscalculations, and save Syria—and the region—from the terrible devastation of state failure and civil war. And Russia can emerge as a leader of positive change in the Arab world with continued influence in the new Syria and an important position in tomorrow’s Middle East.

The Assad family and the regime’s cronies have painted themselves into a corner: they face victory or death. Victory is proving more impossible every day; the regime clique will soon need an exit strategy. The Alawi community has effectively been taken hostage by the Assad regime in a communal confrontation with the Sunni majority that outnumbers them 7 to 1 and that they cannot beat; the Alawis too need an exit strategy from civil war if they are not to become its victims.

The Syrian opposition, as well as the majority of the Syrian population, seek long-overdue and fundamental political reforms, but they do not want civil war and the ruin of Syria. The all-important middle and merchant classes, which have so far not joined the revolution, have no wish to see their homeland destroyed or broken up into mutually hostile sectarian cantons. They would heartily support a power transition that led to greater democracy.

Russia is the only actor today that can offer a win-win solution to these various players and be the architect of a political transition in Syria that will avoid state failure and civil war while ensuring a transition that is positive and stable.

A “Russian Plan” could have elements of other recent transitions in the Arab world. As the West did in Tunisia and Egypt, Russia could use its influence in Syria to encourage a transition without a collapse of state institutions and national order; and as Saudi Arabia and others did in Yemen, it could encourage this transition while offering an exit strategy for the ruling family and clique.

While the Arab League and the West have failed to find a way forward for Syria, and are proposing political and interventionist initiatives that will probably only deepen the crisis, Moscow has a chance to demonstrate its influence, indispensability, and diplomatic acumen by engineering a safe transition for Syria.

In doing so, it will earn the goodwill of the Syrian people as well as the gratitude of many in the Alawi community and even some in the regime itself who realize that they are on a dead-end road. It will also earn the goodwill of countries in the region that fear that the slow and inevitable collapse of the Syrian regime will create instability for the entire Middle East. It will prove Russia’s responsible and positive role in the world community and the Middle East, making Moscow a key player in the new Arab world.

This article originally appeared in Russian in Vedomosti.

About the Author

Paul Salem

Senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute

Paul Salem is a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    Iraq’s Tangled Foreign Interests and Relations

      Paul Salem

  • Article
    Bracing for Impact in Syria

      Paul Salem

Paul Salem
Senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute
Paul Salem
Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyLevantSyriaMiddle EastCaucasusRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Map of Hormuz shipping traffic on a smartphone screen
    Commentary
    Emissary
    “It’s Not Like Turning a Switch On and Off”

    Why the Iran ceasefire isn’t a quick fix to the Strait of Hormuz energy crisis.

      Helima Croft, Aaron David Miller

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    The United States and Iran Have Agreed to a Two-Week Ceasefire

    Spot analysis from Carnegie scholars on events relating to the Middle East and North Africa.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of Everything

    Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.


      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Delegates watch as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks onstage at the World Economic Forum (WEF) on January 21, 2026 in Davos, Switzerland.
    Article
    Unstrategic Ambiguity: Trump’s Erratic Approach Leaves Europe Guessing

    The behaviors, public statements, and policies of Donald Trump’s administration have perverted America’s strategic posture toward Europe.

      Dan Baer, Erik Brown

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    On NATO, Trump Should Embrace France Instead of Bashing It

    Donald Trump’s repudiation of NATO goes against the Make America Great Again vision of a U.S.-centered foreign policy. If the goal is to preserve the alliance by boosting Europe’s commitments, leaning into France’s vision is the most America First way forward.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.