• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Lahcen Achy"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Maghreb"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center

The Arab Spring Revives Maghreb Integration

The Arab Maghreb countries are revisiting the long-dormant Arab Maghreb Union agreement in the hopes that regional integration can help them overcome rising instability and become competitive in this era of change.

Link Copied
By Lahcen Achy
Published on Mar 6, 2012

Source: Al-Hayat

The past few weeks have witnessed intense diplomatic activity among the five Arab Maghreb countries—Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Mauritania, and Libya. With the Arab Spring and widespread economic malaise due to both domestic and external factors, these countries are revisiting the long-dormant Arab Maghreb Union (AMU) agreement in the hopes of jointly overcoming the challenges they face. 

Attempts to achieve political integration in the Maghreb have been made since the AMU’s inception in 1989. A comprehensive strategy adopted in the town of Ras Lanuf, Libya, in 1991 planned for a transition to a free trade zone then to a customs union followed by the establishment of a common market by 2006. This plan failed miserably due to political tensions between member states and resistance to trade liberalization. The last AMU heads of state summit—the union’s decisionmaking body—was held in 1994. 

Since then, the Maghreb countries individually signed free trade agreements with the European Union as well as the Arab world as part of the Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement and the Agadir Agreement, which includes Egypt and Jordan in addition to Morocco and Tunisia. The Arab Spring’s winds of change, the economic challenges faced by the Maghreb governments and the stifling economic crisis in Europe—the Maghreb countries’ main partner—have brought the largely inactive AMU back to the forefront. 

Currently, intraregional trade in the AMU does not exceed 3 percent of the region’s total trade, which is the lowest rate worldwide. Intraregional trade accounts for 60 percent of the trade within the European Union, 22 percent within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and 20 percent among the Mercosur countries. The weak integration in the Maghreb is also obvious when compared to that of other economic communities in Africa. Intraregional trade among the Southern African Development Community represents 30 percent of member states’ total trade. Likewise, intraregional trade within the Economic Community of West African States accounts for 20 percent those states’ total trade.

The Maghreb countries share a common historical and cultural heritage. The success of any economic integration project, however, requires a strong political will to overcome existing differences and build on mutual strategic interests to face various economic and security challenges. Today, some of the AMU’s leaders perceive regional integration as a strong response to the challenges facing the region, be it job creation or balanced regional development in the Maghreb countries.

Maghreb countries, currently, are relatively small and segmented markets. The establishment of a free trade zone or common market, with more than 80 million consumers, would create economies of scale and turn the region into an attractive investment hub. The United States and the European Union will seek to strengthen their economic and strategic relations with the Maghreb in the event of such integration. 

The creation of a free trade zone among the Maghreb countries could increase intraregional trade by five times the prevailing figures. Economic complementarity already exists among Maghreb countries. Algeria and Libya, for instance, produce some of the largest amounts of oil and gas in Africa. Morocco and Tunisia, meanwhile, have diversified agricultural and manufacturing sectors. International experience reveals economic integration itself creates new opportunities for more complementarity based on the comparative advantages of each country. 

Policymakers in the Maghreb must emphasize efficiency in the process of integration and take concrete and realistic measures that, if implemented, would generate short-term tangible results. They must also focus on specific sectors to serve as catalysts for the integration project. The most important steps of an efficient integration process can be summarized as follows:

First, dismantle tariff barriers that hinder the free flow of goods and that reduce trade and economic activity among the Maghreb countries. 

Second, reopen roads and railways between Algeria and Morocco and work toward reducing shipping costs between the Maghreb countries. Shipping costs in the Maghreb are currently twice their average level in industrialized countries and exceed by 25 percent their average in developing countries. Intraregional trade in the Maghreb often passes through European ports before it reaches its final destination. 

Third, remove administrative and technical barriers that impede fluid trade flows among Maghreb countries. Policymakers should pay attention to those arbitrary and unpredictable barriers imposed at borders with no legal basis.

Fourth, restore the credibility of the integration project by implementing transparent mechanisms to monitor, assess and settle trade disputes between companies operating across the Maghreb. 

Fifth, upgrade the investment climate and improve economic governance. Policymakers should not limit integration in the Maghreb to trade policy reform. Existing administrative barriers and regulatory burdens increase transaction costs and have harmful effects on trade and investment. 

Finally, Maghreb leaders should pursue regional integration as a complement to and not a substitute for multilateral relations within the World Trade Organization and free trade agreements with Turkey, Europe, the United States, and other regions. Regional integration can help the countries of the Maghreb overcome rising instability and become competitive in this era of change. 

This piece was originally published in al-Hayat in Arabic.

About the Author

Lahcen Achy

Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Middle East Center

Achy is an economist with expertise in development, institutional economics, trade, and labor and a focus on the Middle East and North Africa.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Arab States Need Industrial Policy Reform

      Lahcen Achy

  • Paper
    The Price of Stability in Algeria

      Lahcen Achy

Lahcen Achy
Former Nonresident Senior Associate, Middle East Center
Lahcen Achy
EconomyMaghreb

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Paper
    Egypt’s Military Landlord Economy and its Limitations

    The armed forces champion a form of capitalism that is generating revenue, but its reliance on rent faces diminishing returns, leaving the country with massive sunk costs and deferred returns, deepening dependency on external borrowing.

      Yezid Sayigh

  • Article
    From Hormuz to the Maghreb: The Geopolitical Reach of a Gulf Crisis

    Morocco and Algeria, each in its own way, are having to navigate the global economic fallout of the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.

      Yasmine Zarhloule

  • Aerial view of Washington DC
    Paper
    Network and Structural Power: The Four Trend Lines Weakening U.S. Leverage

    Networks—from international payments platforms to key economic sectors—underlie many aspects of U.S. power. But they are suffering under an extractive approach to foreign policy.

      Daniel W. Drezner

  • Photo of commercial ship anchored near the Strait of Hormuz.
    Article
    In the Middle East and North Africa, America and China Converge More Than They Diverge

    Middle powers in the region will keep hedging between Washington and Beijing. It’s in the great powers’ interests to play along.

      • Photo of Kathryn Selfe.

      Amr Hamzawy, Kathryn Selfe

  • Container ship arriving in Savannah, Georgia
    Paper
    The Future of American Economic Power

    The future of American economic power will be determined by the interplay between Trump’s ambitions and the global backlash against them, as well as economic developments outside the direct control of the government, such as advances in AI.

      Peter Harrell

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.