C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah
{
"authors": [
"C. Raja Mohan"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie India"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Asia",
"South Asia",
"India",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Chinese Takeaway: Sushma in Beijing
Those who worried that Modi might be provoking China by drawing too close to the United States have reasons to be reassured as External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj concludes a very successful visit to Beijing.
Source: Indian Express
Those in New Delhi who worried that Prime Minister Narendra Modi might be provoking China by drawing too close to US President Barack Obama last month have reasons to be reassured this week as External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj concludes a very successful visit to Beijing. On her first trip to Beijing as India’s top diplomat, Swaraj signalled India’s determination to intensify the engagement with China on a pragmatic basis.
Contrary to the fears in Delhi, the Chinese leadership had no desire to quiz Swaraj on what India was up to with America. That is not how big boys deal with each other. Whatever concerns that the Chinese leaders might have on the future of India’s relations with America, their focus for now is on down-playing contradictions with India and finding common ground between Beijing and Delhi. For, China has enough problems in Asia, especially in its East Asian frontyard. Nor have China’s differences with America become irreconcilable. Not yet.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi was quite calm in responding to questions from reporters about Obama’s visit to India. “India has its relationship with the US; we have our own,” Wang said. “As a good friend of India,” Wang added, “We want India to make friends everywhere.”Wang underlined Beijing’s strong commitment to expand the cooperative engagement with the Modi government. Much in the manner that Washington values a purposeful regime in Delhi that is capable of doing deals, Beijing too is eager to advance on a wide range of issues with the Modi government.
President Xi Jinping, who received Swaraj, expressed satisfaction at the progress in ties since he came to India last September. If Modi hosted Xi in home state Gujarat, the Chinese president wants to show Modi his home town Xian, which is also the ancient capital of China.
BEYOND BINARIES
The warm welcome to Swaraj in China should help India look beyond the proposition that Delhi can simultaneously improve its relations with both Washington and Beijing. It suggests that expanding the relationship with one improves Delhi’s chances with the other.
With neither America nor China asking India to choose between them, the Modi government is in a good position to strengthen its cooperation with both and boost India’s comprehensive national power. It is India’s strategic community that must learn to discard the traditional binaries in its foreign policy discourse — either America or China and alignment versus non-alignment.
There is no reason, too, for India to maintain equal distance from the world’s two greatest powers. There will be some issues on which India will be closer to America — for example, on how to reduce tensions in the South China Sea. On others, like non-intervention in the internal affairs of third countries, Delhi would like to sit in Beijing’s corner.
India’s expanding engagement with China and the United States does not mean they will evolve either symmetrically or at the same pace. For example, on the economic front, China could be the preferred partner in some sectors like physical infrastructure development. The US partnership is critical for the development of India’s knowledge-based industries.
On security issues, America is a distant power with which India has no direct disputes. China, on the other hand, is a large neighbour whose power is growing rapidly. India has big problems with China, including a long and contested boundary. India’s security partnership with America flows naturally from the logic of geopolitics. But how far Delhi might go with Washington would depend on its assessment of the security threats from Beijing.
BOLDER BILATERALISM
In Beijing, Swaraj pressed the right buttons when she outlined a six-point framework to rejuvenate Sino-Indian relations. She called for an “action-oriented approach that can broaden the base of bilateral engagement, deepen convergence on regional and global issues, develop new areas of cooperation, expand strategic communication and build an Asian Century”.
The key word here is “action-oriented”. Swaraj is saying Delhi is ready to go beyond the Indian diplomatic tradition that privileged rhetoric over substance, especially towards China.
Swaraj promised to address Chinese concerns about doing business in India and, at the same time, demanded greater market access in China for Indian goods. She called for more contact and communication between the peoples of the two countries and the promotion of tourism.
She also hinted at the prospects for the two sides exploring “out-of-the-box” solutions to the long-pending territorial dispute. With strong leaders at the helm in both capitals, Swaraj was suggesting, it was time to make bold moves. She was telling her Chinese hosts that Delhi is eager to ensure that Modi’s proposed visit to China, most likely in May, is an “outcome-oriented” one.
This article was originally published in the Indian Express.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.
- Deepening the India-France Maritime PartnershipArticle
- Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New DelhiCommentary
- +1
Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Shadow of the Military in Modern South AsiaArticle
Military rule is now a defining political factor in South Asia. Here’s how analysts can understand and account for it.
Paul Staniland
- Will Hungary’s New Leader Really Change EU Policy on Russia and Ukraine?Commentary
Orbán created an image for himself as virtually the only opponent of aid to Ukraine in the entire EU. But in reality, he was simply willing to use his veto to absorb all the backlash, allowing other opponents to remain in the shadows.
Maksim Samorukov
- How to Join the EU in Three Easy StepsCommentary
Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.
Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni
- India’s Oil Security Strategy: Structural Vulnerabilities and Strategic ChoicesArticle
This piece argues that the present Indian strategy, based on opportunistic diversification and utilization of limited strategic reserves, remains inadequate when confronting supply disruptions. It evaluates India’s options in the short, medium, and long terms.
Vrinda Sahai
- Leveraging Internal Security Cooperation with Vietnam Offers a Glimpse of Future Chinese Diplomacy with Southeast AsiaArticle
Despite long-standing differences, China and Vietnam are reinforcing common ground for collaboration, especially in public security. This internal security–centered diplomacy offers a strengthened road map for how China moves forward with Southeast Asia.
Sophie Zhuang