• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Yukon Huang"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Debating China’s Growth Exceptionalism

Those who doubt China’s prospects in the near term emphasize economic distortions. China bulls, on the other hand, assert that competent policies will help the economy rebound. Both groups are correct with respect to their own time horizon.

Link Copied
By Yukon Huang
Published on Feb 10, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

Source: Financial Times

Arguments about China’s growth prospects are often muddled by the divergent perspectives of optimists and pessimists. The two groups tend to use different time horizons, and to focus on different concepts, in evaluating China’s chances for success.

Those shorting China are fixated on what is happening today and what will happen six months from now. Thus, the steady decline in the monthly purchasing managers index — which measures changes in the manufacturing sector — as well as disappointing industrial production numbers have inevitably given rise to predictions that GDP growth will continue to sink. China’s GDP growth rate has fallen more-or-less steadily since the financial crisis, and bearish investors expect further declines from last year’s 7.4 per cent in the absence of additional stimulus and more aggressive actions. Such actions could include the recent cut in bank reserve requirements by half a percentage point or a likely decline in deposit rates.

But even these measures will not prevent growth rates from falling closer to six per cent over the coming year or two as excess industrial capacity and an over-built property market are brought in line with sustainable demand. Firms are not yet in the mood to invest and more expansionary monetary policies will not make an appreciable difference. For the moment, Beijing has little choice but to let the cyclical downturn play itself out.

More hardened pessimists see China collapsing in the medium term on account of ever-rising debt levels. These views are exaggerated. While China’s debt problems are serious, they are manageable, and China has beaten similar financial challenges before. A decade and a half ago, China had to deal with a comparable debt build-up during the Asian financial crisis. At the time, the debt-to-GDP ratio surged by about 50 per cent over six years, similar to what has been happening since the 2008 global financial crisis. In the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis, non-performing loans amounted to some 40 per cent of the portfolios of the major banks. These ultimately had to be absorbed by the State through asset management companies. Today, one can foresee the possibility of a similar kind of clean-up of non-performing loans, but the magnitude would only be a fraction of the previous episode.

After the Asian financial crisis, however, a combination of economic reforms and expanding demand in the West led to the re-establishment of rapid growth as the norm for another decade. This time around, global conditions are less supportive, and many of the sources of the country’s easiest productivity gains have already been tapped. China also faces many self-imposed challenges, including barriers to labour mobility, an ageing population problem exacerbated by its one-child policy and rigid controls on information that inhibit innovation. Eminent prognosticators like Lawrence Summers have argued that China cannot continue to defy the law of averages, and that growth rates will converge to the global mean of three to four per cent by the end of this decade.

The pessimists may have the stronger argument in the short term. But one can still be bullish about the longer-term prospects of the Chinese economy. The flip side of China’s obvious but correctable distortions, and its large and persistent technological gap as compared to the West, is that there remains significant growth potential if conditions were to improve. With the right policies, China could continue to grow faster than the norm for some time.

Investors holding this more charitable view see a country that has consistently defied expectations. Despite its major price distortions and weak institutions, until recently China was able to grow at an unprecedented ten per cent annually, and to sustain similar rates, with a few set-backs, for three decades. Its success came from gradually introducing more market and competitive pressures into its socialist economic system.

Investors who doubt China’s prospects in the near term emphasise the remaining distortions and the difficulties Chinese authorities will face in removing them. In the longer term, China bulls are betting that competent policies and a government still fixated on headline growth numbers will help the economy rebound and eventually grow at more than seven per cent for another decade. Both groups are likely correct with respect to their own time horizon.

This article was originally published by the Financial Times.

About the Author

Yukon Huang

Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Huang is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program where his research focuses on China’s economy and its regional and global impact.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Three Takeaways From the Biden-Xi Meeting

      Yukon Huang, Isaac B. Kardon, Matt Sheehan

  • Commentary
    Europe Narrowly Navigates De-risking Between Washington and Beijing

      Yukon Huang, Genevieve Slosberg

Yukon Huang
Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Yukon Huang
EconomyEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • People standing on rocks in the ocean near the shore, with soldiers in the foreground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Migration Wave That Embarrassed Morocco and Rattled Europe

    Most migrants may have left Ceuta, but the effects may linger.

      • Alejandro Rodriguez
      • Sarah Yerkes

      Alejandro Martin Rodriguez, Sarah Yerkes

  • Shadowed figure lighting grocery store shelves
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Five Years After His Power Grab, Tunisia’s President Has Only Achieved Failure

    Saied’s main accomplishment has been to destroy a decade’s worth of democratic progress.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes

  • Port cranes at sunset
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Drone Attack on Egypt and the Widening Middle East War

    The targeting of Damietta Port appears to be more than a mere security message.

      Amr Hamzawy

  • An aerial drone photo taken on June 4, 2026 shows a wind-photovoltaic power storage station of Huadian Inner Mongolia New Energy Co., Ltd. as part of the Horinger data center cluster green energy supply demonstration project, in Hohhot, north China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
    Commentary
    Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?

    China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Channels of China’s Currency Promotion in Gulf Markets

    Is the Gulf moving beyond the dollar? This article examines how China is expanding the renminbi's role across Gulf markets, what that means for regional finance, and why the future of global currencies is more complex than the de-dollarization debate suggests.

      Andrew Bonney

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.