How Fear Drives American Politics

{
  "authors": [
    "David Rothkopf"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Democracy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

How Fear Drives American Politics

Instead of looking to build the future, it sometimes feels like the U.S. political establishment happily retreats into fear and willful ignorance.

By David Rothkopf

Published on Mar 16, 2015

Source: TED2015

Does it seem like Washington has no new ideas? Instead of looking to build the future, it sometimes feels like the U.S. political establishment happily retreats into fear and willful ignorance. Journalist David Rothkopf lays out a few of the major issues that U.S. leadership is failing to address—from cybercrime to world-shaking new tech to the reality of modern total war—and calls for a new vision that sets fear aside.

This talk was originally delivered at TED2015.

About the Author

David Rothkopf

Former Visiting Scholar

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group.

Recent Work

In The Media
How Bush, Obama, and Trump Ended Pax Americana
- David Rothkopf
In The Media
A Bigger Clubhouse
- David Rothkopf

Political Reform Democracy Foreign Policy North America United States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
Who Puts Guardrails on AI?
Why governance of rapidly evolving technology will be distributed and complex.
Stewart Patrick, Scott Singer
Commentary
Emissary
The U.S. and China Need an AI Hotline. Here’s How to Build It.
It should address the shortcomings of previous crisis communication efforts and adapt to the demands of frontier AI.
Lucy Luo
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Leaving Russian-Speakers Without Representation Is a Risk for Latvia
If the Russian-speaking community in Latvia cannot articulate their interests without being seen as disloyal, they could end up embracing a pro-Kremlin agenda.
Sergejs Potapkins
Commentary
Emissary
The UN Isn’t Declining. It’s Decomposing.
Washington’s decision to support some UN functions while letting others wither is pulling the organization apart at the seams.
Stewart Patrick, Theodore Zaritsky
Paper
2026 Carnegie California AI Survey
While there are notable demographic, economic, and geographic divides over AI, there is also substantial alignment between Republicans and Democrats.
+2
Ian Klaus, Mark Baldassare, Rachel George, …

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Emissary

Who Puts Guardrails on AI?

Why governance of rapidly evolving technology will be distributed and complex.

Stewart Patrick, Scott Singer

Trump walking toward Xi, both with arms extended to shake hands

Commentary

Emissary

The U.S. and China Need an AI Hotline. Here’s How to Build It.

It should address the shortcomings of previous crisis communication efforts and adapt to the demands of frontier AI.

Lucy Luo

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Leaving Russian-Speakers Without Representation Is a Risk for Latvia

If the Russian-speaking community in Latvia cannot articulate their interests without being seen as disloyal, they could end up embracing a pro-Kremlin agenda.