• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Iran",
    "Afghanistan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}
In The Media
Carnegie India

How the Iran Nuke Deal Gives India Room in the Greater Middle East

The historic nuclear accord between Iran and the international community unveiled in Vienna helps remove a number of recent constraints on Indian foreign policy.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Jul 15, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

The historic nuclear accord between Iran and the international community unveiled in Vienna on Tuesday helps remove a number of recent constraints on Indian foreign policy. As they facilitate a larger Indian role the Greater Middle East, the consequences of the nuclear agreement also present New Delhi with a number of new geopolitical challenges.

Over the last decade, the deepening tensions between Washington and Tehran had threatened India’s prospects for reconciliation with the global nuclear order, prevented it from an effective pursuit of energy security, limited its options in stabilising Afghanistan, and weakened its ability to cope with violent religious extremism.

The accord, which blocks Iran’s pathways to assembling a nuclear weapon on short order in return for lifting most of the sanctions on Tehran, vindicates New Delhi’s prudent strategy that acknowledged the problems with the Iranian nuclear programme, called for a peaceful resolution of the dispute, and focused on India’s own liberation from atomic sanctions.

New Delhi’s attitude to Iran’s proliferation became Washington’s touchstone in accepting India’s atomic exceptionalism under the controversial civil nuclear initiative unveiled by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President George W Bush in July 2005.

Many on the left and right in New Delhi demanded that India blindly back Tehran against Washington. If New Delhi had taken that advice, India might be gnashing its teeth today, as Tehran, in the name of “heroic flexibility”, offered multiple concessions to Washington to secure the deal.

Like the US-India civil nuclear initiative, the understanding between Washington and Tehran is bound to face intense scrutiny from opponents in both capitals who are determined to undermine it. The arguments will be heated and focused on a range of technical issues. But the real issues are political.

The deal is not just about preventing Iran’s nuclear proliferation. It is also about normalising relations between Washington and Tehran after three and a half decades of intense hostility since the 1979 Islamic revolution ousted the Shah of Iran, one of America’s leading allies in the region.

President Barack Obama is persuading America to overcome decades of demonizing Iran and accept Tehran’s critical role in shaping the future of the Middle East. As the US-Iran nuclear deal rearranges the regional balance of power, there will be many significant opportunities and challenges for India.

For one, the lifting of international sanctions will bring large amounts of Iranian oil into the market and push petroleum prices down for an extended period of time and boost India’s macroeconomic stability. At a broader level, Indian companies will be able to partake and benefit from Iran’s renewed economic growth.

The good news on the economic front is leavened with new political challenges that will emerge from the nuclear accord. The US-Iran political thaw has generated deep anxieties among America’s traditional allies in the region — including Israel and Saudi Arabia.

The rise of Iran has pushed these two into an unlikely partnership; and both of them are likely to take steps of their own to deal with the consequences of Iran’s new status in the region.

It is not unreasonable to assume that the current tensions between Iran and Israel, and between Tehran and some of its Arab neighbours, are likely to sharpen in the coming months and years.

While India’s opportunities in Iran are prospective, its current engagement with the region is weighted heavily towards the Arab Gulf and Israel. New Delhi, then, will have to devote greater attention to the region and learn to navigate the region’s new contradictions.

India’s thinking about the Middle East, whether from the UPA or NDA, has tended to be ideological and rooted in their domestic political considerations. Prime Minister Narendra Modi needs to break from this tradition and develop a strategy towards the Middle East that is firmly anchored in realpolitik.

As the Middle East becomes more complex and demanding, India’s options in Central Asia and Afghanistan are likely to expand rapidly as Tehran’s isolation ends. Iran’s role as India’s gateway to Central Asia, amidst Pakistan’s reluctance to offer overland transit facilities, has already begun to acquire renewed salience for the Modi government.

Iran’s rise as a regional actor will also open new options for India in Afghanistan amidst the current gloom about New Delhi’s declining capacity to influence the events in the country after US troops have ended their combat role there.

While the situation is not entirely similar to the mid 1990s, when New Delhi and Tehran actively collaborated to counter the influence of Pakistan and the Taliban, there will be room for much coordination between India and Iran. If America and Iran do begin to cooperate against violent extremism in the Greater Middle East, it should have many positive consequences for combating terrorism in the subcontinent.

As Iran and America move from nuclear accommodation to political cooperation, New Delhi must discard its shibboleths on the Middle East and embark on a vigorous and pragmatic engagement with all the key actors in the region, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Israel.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicyPolitical ReformSouth AsiaIndiaNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastIranAfghanistan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • People on a stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Dangerous Consequences of Treating Colombia Like Venezuela

    When democracies and autocracies are seen as interchangeable targets, the language of democracy becomes hollow, and the incentives for democratic governance erode.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes, Amr Hamzawy

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Has Trump the Destroyer Eclipsed Putin the Destroyer?

    Unexpectedly, Trump’s America appears to have replaced Putin’s Russia’s as the world’s biggest disruptor.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Soldier looking at a drone on the ground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Are All Wars Now Drone Wars?

    From Sudan to Ukraine, UAVs have upended warfighting tactics and become one of the most destructive weapons of conflict.

      • Jon Bateman

      Jon Bateman, Steve Feldstein

  • Carney speaking on stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Carney’s Remarkable Message to Middle Powers

    And how they can respond.

      • +1

      Sophia Besch, Steve Feldstein, Stewart Patrick, …

  • Trump speaking on a stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Greenland Episode Must Be a Lesson for Europe and NATO

    They cannot return to the comforts of asymmetric reliance, dressed up as partnership.

      Sophia Besch

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.