commentary

Why Voters Sometimes Prefer Criminals as Candidates

Indian voters do not elect criminals out of ignorance. Instead, candidates with serious criminal records are sometimes preferred because their criminality signals their credibility.

by Milan Vaishnav

published by

Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions

on October 1, 2016

Source: Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions

In democracies around the world, candidates who stand accused or convicted of criminal misconduct routinely win elections and assume important positions. According to data collected by Transparência Brasil, 60% of Brazil’s federal legislators have either been convicted of a crime or are the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation. Ahead of Nigeria’s 2015 election, candidates openly brandished their allegiances to militia groups or criminal gangs while canvassing for votes. The cozy relationship between criminal malfeasance and democratic politics is by no means restricted to the developing world. A May 2016 report in the New York Times revealed that as many as 30 current and former state legislators in New York have been convicted, indicted, or accused of engaging in criminal wrongdoing in the past decade alone.....

Read Full Text

This article was originally published in Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

Why Voters Sometimes Prefer Criminals as Candidates

More work from Carnegie