• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Shi Zhiqin",
    "Li Lianxing"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China and the Developing World",
    "China’s Foreign Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie China

FOCAC and BRI Bring Reciprocal Benefit for China and Africa

The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) was established far earlier than the BRI, and it has become a sophisticated framework for China’s partnerships with African countries. Thus, FOCAC can be a mini-version of multilateral cooperation that aids the implementation of BRI projects.

Link Copied
By Shi Zhiqin and Li Lianxing
Published on Sep 4, 2018

Source: CGTN

A rising continent, Africa, is expected to be more deeply engaged with China’s grand vision of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Chinese President Xi Jinping, during the country’s biggest diplomatic event in Beijing, encouraged more African countries and entrepreneurs to join this multilateral platform to further increase the quality of bilateral relations.

He said Africa is a natural part of the Initiative and it should be a significant one. He added that China is willing to extend the BRI to more African countries on the basis of equality and mutual benefit.

However, to many of those countries, Xi’s idea is still a new concept. Moreover, challenges are ahead for both to see how this plan will work in an African context.

The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) was established far earlier than the BRI, and it has become a sophisticated framework for China’s partnerships with African countries. Thus, FOCAC can be a mini-version of multilateral cooperation that aids the implementation of BRI projects.

FOCAC offers the foundation of China’s policy toward Africa, and the BRI addresses multilateral platforms and connectivity, which means the BRI is expected to bring Africa into a wider world market.

This relationship is novel to many African countries, and it will take time for them to adjust to these two mechanisms. China also needs to demonstrate the values of the two in a more vivid way.

China’s policies of non-intervention and non-political cooperation are valued by African countries, as they allow independence for suitable development.

As the BRI links more players into the partnership, which has deepened with current partners in Africa, China still sees these policies as vital. China has repeatedly said it won’t export its development “model” to any country as each country has its own unique social-historical background. However, it doesn’t mean China’s development experiences can’t be shared with others.

For African countries, there are more reasons for China to share its development experiences considering their common history and similar starting point. Thus the BRI will not only be a platform of concrete projects, but also a platform of economic and political experience sharing.

Quality of cooperation was another keyword in President Xi’s speech at the event. He said the BRI should rightly identify the bottlenecks of Africa’s development and avoid wasting funds.

During the past few decades of cooperation, both parties have been learning about each other’s tempo and now are more orchestrated. Africa has become more confident to design and develop its destiny and China in return also is more aware of what can be offered to Africa.

It is therefore vital for both to identify and support the key projects that may bring breakthroughs or essential changes to host countries.

Contrary to conventional knowledge that Africa is purely a recipient in the relationship with China, African countries have been developing their own “homegrown solutions” and actively shaping their partnerships with China to achieve goals.

While Africa is developing more high quality ties with China, President Xi has committed to further open China’s market to the world, including Africa, under the BRI framework. This is a golden chance for Africa to reduce its investment deficit with China, and many African entrepreneurs have tasted success.

Many may not know that one of China’s biggest mobile application’s shareholders is from South Africa. It's not only about doing business in Africa, but embracing more African investments in China as well.

Furthermore, President Xi also noted that the BRI is an open and inclusive platform and it welcomes trilateral cooperation with the premise of Africa’s consent. Isolation shouldn’t be the trend, and a more shared and connected world is key to common development for all.

Africa’s development comes at a good time as there are many lessons and experiences to be learned from all over the world; thus trilateral cooperation may make the best use of various parties’ development advantages.

However, Africans don’t hide their concern that trilateral cooperation among Africa, China and the West may drag the continent into colonialism again and greatly impair its independence.

That’s why China has insisted that all possible trilateral cooperation taking place in Africa should fully respect Africa’s willingness and independence and that Africa should take a lead in such projects. The BRI may bring more opportunities to involved players, but all projects should be tested by this principle.

FOCAC and the BRI hope to create a more bonded community for China and Africa so that they can face the current international challenges.

China and African countries not only share a similar history and resonate with each other emotionally, but more importantly, they are all developing countries that can be easily affected by this uncertain and turbulent world. Common challenges and interests form a strong foundation of the bilateral ties between China and Africa.

This piece was originally published by CGTN.

About the Authors

Shi Zhiqin

Former Resident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy

Shi Zhiqin was a resident scholar at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center until June 2020.

Li Lianxing

Authors

Shi Zhiqin
Former Resident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Li Lianxing
Economy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Europe trade economy container supply chains
    Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

    As geopolitical rivalry weaponizes global supply chains, the EU’s true vulnerability lies in emerging-risk imports. For these goods, suppliers are growing more concentrated, substitution more difficult, and political risk is looming.

      Sinan Ülgen

  • Pashinyan surrounded by supporters while speaking to reporters
    Commentary
    Next Steps Toward Peace After the Armenian Elections

    It’s time to build momentum, and Ankara is the venue of the next opportune diplomatic window to do this.

      • Garo Paylan

      Alper Coşkun, Garo Paylan

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Security Strategy: In Search of a New Ambition

    The EU is putting together a new security strategy to meet today’s myriad challenges. But for any proposal to be effective, the union needs to grapple with its identity and ambitions.

      Pierre Vimont

  • two men sitting next to each other
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Senegal’s Debt Crisis Has Moved Its Leaders from Partners to Rivals

    The impacts of the Faye-Sonko rupture could go well beyond the country’s borders.

      • Dr. Lesley Anne Warner

      Lesley Anne Warner

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

    A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.  

      Alexandra Prokopenko

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.